Dynamics and processivity of 40S ribosome scanning on mRNA in yeast

The eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit locates the translation initiation codon on an mRNA via the so‐called scanning process that follows 40S binding to the capped 5′ end. This key step in translation is required for the expression of almost all eukaryotic genes, yet the mechanism and dynamics of scanning are unknown. We have performed quantitative studies in vivo and in vitro of the movement of yeast 40S ribosomes along 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of different lengths. 40S subunits perform cap‐dependent scanning with high processivity for more than 1700 nucleotides in cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Moreover, the observed rates of expression indicate that scanning is performed by an untethered 40S subunit that has been released from the 5′ cap complex. Unexpectedly, the capability to maintain scanning competence on a long 5′ UTR is more dependent on the Ded1/Dbp1 type of helicase than on eIF4A or eIF4B. In a yeast cell‐free extract, scanning shows reduced processivity, with an estimated net 5′→3′ rate of approximately 10 nucleotides per second at 26°C. We have developed a biased bidirectional walking model of ribosomal scanning that provides a framework for understanding the above observations as well as other known quantitative and qualitative features of this process.

[1]  M. Rodnina,et al.  Late events of translation initiation in bacteria: a kinetic analysis , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[2]  Donahue Tf,et al.  Sequence and structural requirements for efficient translation in yeast. , 1990 .

[3]  C. Hellen,et al.  Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons , 1998, Nature.

[4]  M. Kozak,et al.  Circumstances and mechanisms of inhibition of translation by secondary structure in eucaryotic mRNAs , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  The requirement for eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (elF4A) in translation is in direct proportion to the degree of mRNA 5' secondary structure. , 2001, RNA.

[6]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Translational control of gene expression , 2000 .

[7]  J. de la Cruz,et al.  The p20 and Ded1 proteins have antagonistic roles in eIF4E-dependent translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Physical evidence for distinct mechanisms of translational control by upstream open reading frames , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[9]  Patrick O. Brown,et al.  Global and Specific Translational Regulation in the Genomic Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a Rapid Transfer from a Fermentable to a Nonfermentable Carbon Source , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  Bin Li,et al.  The Yeast Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4G (eIF4G) HEAT Domain Interacts with eIF1 and eIF5 and Is Involved in Stringent AUG Selection , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[11]  U. Baumann,et al.  Interaction of Translation Initiation Factor eIF4G with eIF4A in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae * , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  R. Jackson.  The ATP requirement for initiation of eukaryotic translation varies according to the mRNA species. , 1991, European journal of biochemistry.

[13]  M. Kozak,et al.  How do eucaryotic ribosomes select initiation regions in messenger RNA? , 1978, Cell.

[14]  G. Fink,et al.  Laboratory course manual for methods in yeast genetics , 1986 .

[15]  A. Cigan,et al.  Sequence and structural requirements for efficient translation in yeast. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  J R Lorsch,et al.  Kinetic dissection of fundamental processes of eukaryotic translation initiation in vitro , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[17]  R. Schiestl,et al.  High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier , 1989, Current Genetics.

[18]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Inhibition of translational initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by secondary structure: the roles of the stability and position of stem‐loops in the mRNA leader , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Multiple roles for the C‐terminal domain of eIF5 in translation initiation complex assembly and GTPase activation , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[20]  M. Ares,et al.  Depletion of U3 small nucleolar RNA inhibits cleavage in the 5′ external transcribed spacer of yeast pre‐ribosomal RNA and impairs formation of 18S ribosomal RNA. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Barbara Fink,et al.  Tetracycline‐aptamer‐mediated translational regulation in yeast , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[22]  M. Kozak.  Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Kozak,et al.  Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation , 2002, Gene.

[24]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Ded1p, a DEAD-box Protein Required for Translation Initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Is an RNA Helicase* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  B. Wittmer,et al.  A Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of mammalian translation initiation factor 4B contributes to RNA helicase activity. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Gerald R. Fink,et al.  Methods in Yeast Genetics: Laboratory Manual , 1981 .

[27]  J. Beggs,et al.  A suppressor of yeast spp81/ded1 mutations encodes a very similar putative ATP‐dependent RNA helicase , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[28]  M. Kozak,et al.  Selection of initiation sites by eucaryotic ribosomes: effect of inserting AUG triplets upstream from the coding sequence for preproinsulin. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Thomas A. Steitz,et al.  The involvement of RNA in ribosome function , 2002, Nature.

[30]  M. Kozak.  Role of ATP in binding and migration of 40S ribosomal subunits , 1980, Cell.

[31]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Translational control of gene expression , 2000 .

[32]  A. Sachs,et al.  Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors 4G and 4A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae Interact Physically and Functionally , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Posttranscriptional Control of Gene Expression in Yeast , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[34]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Intracellular translation initiation factor levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their role in cap‐complex function , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[35]  P. Linder,et al.  A new yeast translation initiation factor suppresses a mutation in the eIF‐4A RNA helicase. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[36]  S. R. Schmid,et al.  Translation initiation factor 4A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: analysis of residues conserved in the D-E-A-D family of RNA helicases , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[37]  Xiang Yu,et al.  Expression of a Micro-protein* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[39]  P. Linder.  Yeast RNA helicases of the DEAD‐box family involved in translation initiation , 2003, Biology of the cell.

[40]  Gregory R. Grant,et al.  Statistical Methods in Bioinformatics , 2001 .

[41]  J. Warwicker,et al.  A second eIF4E protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe has distinct eIF4G-binding properties. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  M. Kozak,et al.  Constraints on reinitiation of translation in mammals. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  R. Planta,et al.  Effect of deletions in the 5'-noncoding region on the translational efficiency of phosphoglycerate kinase mRNA in yeast. , 1989, Gene.

[44]  B. M. Jackson,et al.  Suppression of ribosomal reinitiation at upstream open reading frames in amino acid-starved cells forms the basis for GCN4 translational control , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[45]  W. Merrick,et al.  Modulation of the Helicase Activity of eIF4A by eIF4B, eIF4H, and eIF4F* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  A. Hinnebusch.  Evidence for translational regulation of the activator of general amino acid control in yeast. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  P. Sarnow,et al.  Translation-competent extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of L-A RNA, 5' cap, and 3' poly(A) tail on translational efficiency of mRNAs. , 1997, Methods.

[48]  M. Kozak,et al.  An analysis of vertebrate mRNA sequences: intimations of translational control , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  Joachim Frank,et al.  Electron microscopy of functional ribosome complexes. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[50]  A. Brown,et al.  Inhibition of translational initiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a function of the stability and position of hairpin structures in the mRNA leader. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[51]  R. Chuang,et al.  Requirement of the DEAD-Box Protein Ded1p for Messenger RNA Translation , 1997, Science.

[52]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The Position Dependence of Translational Regulation via RNA-RNA and RNA-Protein Interactions in the 5′-Untranslated Region of Eukaryotic mRNA Is a Function of the Thermodynamic Competence of 40 S Ribosomes in Translational Initiation* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.