Deliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: evidence from USA and India

Groups make decisions on both the production and the distribution of resources. These decisions typically involve a tension between increasing the total level of group resources (i.e. social efficiency) and distributing these resources among group members (i.e. individuals' relative shares). This is the case because the redistribution process may destroy part of the resources, thus resulting in socially inefficient allocations. Here we apply a dual-process approach to understand the cognitive underpinnings of this fundamental tension. We conducted a set of experiments to examine the extent to which different allocation decisions respond to intuition or deliberation. In a newly developed approach, we assess intuition and deliberation at both the trait level (using the Cognitive Reflection Test, henceforth CRT) and the state level (through the experimental manipulation of response times). To test for robustness, experiments were conducted in two countries: the USA and India. Despite absolute-level differences across countries, in both locations we show that: (i) time pressure and low CRT scores are associated with individuals' concerns for their relative shares and (ii) time delay and high CRT scores are associated with individuals' concerns for social efficiency. These findings demonstrate that deliberation favours social efficiency by overriding individuals' intuitive tendency to focus on relative shares.

[1]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference , 2015, Nature Communications.

[2]  Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al.  Does Intuition Cause Cooperation? , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  R. Guha India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy , 2007 .

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  From good institutions to generous citizens: Top-down incentives to cooperate promote subsequent prosociality but not norm enforcement , 2016, Cognition.

[5]  Roman M. Sheremeta Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests , 2016 .

[6]  D. Dickinson,et al.  Moderate Sleep Restriction and time-of-day impacts on simple social interactions , 2016 .

[7]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. , 2005 .

[8]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment , 2011, Cognition.

[9]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[10]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[12]  M. Nowak,et al.  Cooperate without looking: Why we care what people think and not just what they do , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  Kai Chi Yam,et al.  The hungry thief: Physiological deprivation and its effects on unethical behavior , 2014 .

[15]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  To Know or Not to Know? Looking at Payoffs Signals Selfish Behavior, But It Does Not Actually Mean So , 2015, ArXiv.

[16]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[17]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[18]  P. Kitcher The Evolution of Human Altruism , 1993 .

[19]  Ismael Rodríguez-Lara,et al.  Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[20]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[21]  References , 1971 .

[22]  Jean‐François Bonnefon,et al.  Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian , 2012, Cognition.

[23]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[24]  B. Bushman,et al.  Too fatigued to care: Ego depletion, guilt, and prosocial behavior , 2012 .

[25]  Jeffrey A. Busse,et al.  Market Efficiency in Real-Time , 2001 .

[26]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Dent,et al.  Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[28]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Too Tired to Tell the Truth: Self-Control Resource Depletion and Dishonesty. , 2009, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[29]  J. Lohse Smart or Selfish - When Smart Guys Finish Nice , 2014 .

[30]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[31]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[32]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment , 2022 .

[33]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  To Know or Not to Know? Looking at Payoffs Signals Selfish Behavior, But It Does Not Actually Mean So , 2016 .

[34]  Jenifer Z. Siegel,et al.  Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  L. Cameron,et al.  Raising the Stakes in the Ultimatum Game: Experimental Evidence From Indonesia , 1999 .

[36]  David G. Rand,et al.  Promoting cooperation in the field , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[37]  David G. Rand,et al.  The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer , 2002 .

[40]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Stefan T. Trautmann,et al.  Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[42]  David G. Rand,et al.  Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  A. Espín,et al.  Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D:4D) predict cognitive reflection? , 2014, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[44]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[45]  M. Kocher,et al.  Does Stake Size Matter for Cooperation and Punishment? , 2006 .

[46]  David G. Rand,et al.  Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[47]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Egalitarianism and Competitiveness , 2009 .

[49]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Inside the Turk , 2014 .

[50]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  The emergence of hyper-altruistic behaviour in conflictual situations , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[51]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  M. Rabin,et al.  Understanding Social Preference with Simple Tests , 2001 .

[54]  Antonio M. Espín,et al.  The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[55]  Jon T. S. Quah Curbing Corruption in India: An Impossible Dream? , 2008 .

[56]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game , 2015, Games.

[57]  Yue-Jia Luo,et al.  Neural signatures of fairness‐related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[58]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[59]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[60]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[61]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[62]  Edward T. Cokely,et al.  Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test , 2012, Judgment and Decision Making.

[63]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[64]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Heuristics and Social Roles: Intuition Favors Altruism for Women But Not for Men , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[65]  Kate A. Ratliff,et al.  Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes , 2015, Psychological science.

[66]  David G. Rand,et al.  Risking Your Life without a Second Thought: Intuitive Decision-Making and Extreme Altruism , 2014, PloS one.

[67]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Does stake size matter in trust games , 2005 .

[68]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments , 2002 .

[69]  E. Peters,et al.  Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[70]  L. Kohlberg The Philosophy of Moral Development Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice , 1981 .

[71]  S. Quartz,et al.  The Right and the Good: Distributive Justice and Neural Encoding of Equity and Efficiency , 2008, Science.

[72]  Simon Gächter,et al.  Intrinsic Honesty and the Prevalence of Rule Violations across Societies , 2016, Nature.

[73]  V. Capraro,et al.  Rethinking spontaneous giving: Extreme time pressure and ego-depletion favor self-regarding reactions , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[74]  N. Raihani,et al.  The Effect of $1, $5 and $10 Stakes in an Online Dictator Game , 2013, PloS one.

[75]  Antonio A. Arechar,et al.  Conducting interactive experiments online , 2017, Experimental Economics.

[76]  Jean-Robert Tyran,et al.  Fairness is intuitive , 2014 .

[77]  Dirk Engelmann How not to extend models of inequality aversion , 2012 .

[78]  Valerio Capraro,et al.  A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2013, PloS one.

[79]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[80]  Dan W. Brockt,et al.  The Theory of Justice , 2017 .

[81]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Spite and Development , 2008 .

[82]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Intuition and cooperation reconsidered , 2013, Nature.

[83]  Ralph Hertwig,et al.  Time and moral judgment , 2011, Cognition.

[84]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[85]  David G. Rand Cooperation, Fast and Slow , 2016, Psychological science.

[86]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[87]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2014 .

[88]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when , 2019, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.

[89]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[90]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[91]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[92]  A. Roth,et al.  Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet , 2002 .

[93]  David G. Rand,et al.  Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.