Why Economics Matters for Endangered Species Protection

Abstract: We offer three reasons why economics matters more to species protection than many people think and what this implies for the ongoing debate over the reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Economics matters because (1) human behavior generally, and economic parameters in particular, help determine the degree of risk to a species; (2) in a world of scarce resources, the opportunity cost of species protection—the costs of reduced resources for other worthwhile causes—must be taken into account in decision making; and (3) economic incentives are critical in shaping human behavior, and consequently the recovery of species. Endangered species protection that explicitly addresses these basic principles can avoid wasting valuable resources that yield no gain in species protection.

[1]  D. Jablonski,et al.  Extinctions: a paleontological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[2]  D. Ehrenfeld Why Put a Value on Biodiversity , 1988 .

[3]  M. Soulé,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation , 1987 .

[4]  Robert Innes,et al.  Takings, Compensation, and Equal Treatment for Owners of Developed and Undeveloped Property1 , 1997, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[6]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Takings, Compensation and Endangered Species Protection on Private Lands , 1998 .

[7]  J. Rappole,et al.  The Science of Conservation Planning: Habitat Conservation Under The Endangered Species Act , 1997 .

[8]  Mark D. Agee,et al.  Economies, Human Capital, and Natural Assets , 1998 .

[9]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Limitations of Captive Breeding in Endangered Species Recovery , 1996 .

[10]  Lawrence E. Blume,et al.  The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid? , 1984 .

[11]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Richard Lotspeich,et al.  The Economics and Ecology of Biodiversity Decline , 1996 .

[13]  E. Wilson,et al.  Why Put a Value on Biodiversity , 1988 .

[14]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[15]  Building a Scientifically Sound Policy for Protecting Endangered Species , 1995, Science.

[16]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  The Marginal Cost of Species Preservation: The Northern Spotted Owl , 1994 .

[17]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Contribution of Population and Community Biology to Conservation Science , 1988 .

[18]  S. Polasky,et al.  When the Truth Hurts: Endangered Species Policy on Private Land with Imperfect Information☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[19]  K. Arrow,et al.  Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? , 1996, Science.

[20]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987 .

[21]  N. Bockstael Modeling Economics and Ecology: The Importance of a Spatial Perspective , 1996 .

[22]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  The Private-Land Problem , 1997 .

[23]  Richard A. Epstein,et al.  Simple Rules for a Complex World , 1995 .

[24]  J. Tschirhart,et al.  Ecosystems, externalities, and economies , 1992, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[25]  Peter L. Forey,et al.  Systematics and conservation evaluation , 1994 .

[26]  Thomas D. Crocker,et al.  Economic Valuation of Ecosystems , 1987 .

[27]  Paul McErlain-Ward Science and the Endangered Species Act , 1996 .

[28]  C. Mann,et al.  Noah's Choice: The Future of Endangered Species , 1995 .

[29]  F. Shilling Do Habitat Conservation Plans Protect Endangered Species , 1997 .

[30]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[31]  A. Dobson,et al.  Strengthening the Use of Science In Achieving the Goals of the Endangered Species Act: An Assessment By the Ecological Society of America , 1996 .

[32]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation , 1994 .

[33]  J. Shogren,et al.  Economics of the Endangered Species Act , 1998 .