Physiological Relevance of a Minimal Model in Healthy Pigs Lung

Abstract Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is the primary form of support for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress (ALI/ARDS) patients. However, intra- and inter- patient variability makes consistent care difficult and encourages the use of modeling approach to assist in patient-specific MV treatment. A minimal model is tested in 9 healthy pigs and subsequently in 3 ARDS pigs to evaluate its performance and physiological relevance for both conditions, as well as change in condition. The model estimates the mean of threshold opening pressure (TOP), mean threshold closing pressure (TCP) and standard deviation (SD) of both the TOP and TCP distribution for the animal at each different condition. The median percentage fitting error during inflation healthy and ARDS is less than 7.0% across all animals, indicating that the model is capable of capturing the fundamental lung mechanics during PEEP increase. An increase of mean TOP is observed between healthy and ARDS animal, suggesting higher pressure is required to recruit injured and collapsed lung during ARDS. The minimal model was able to capture the characteristic of both healthy and ARDS lungs, and it is able to track disease progression between states. It thus offers potentially opportunity to guide clinical decision making.

[1]  Knut Möller,et al.  Hierarchical Parameter Identification in Models of Respiratory Mechanics , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Yeong Shiong Chiew,et al.  Model-based optimal PEEP in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients in the Intensive Care Unit , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[3]  Thomas Desaive,et al.  Physiological modeling, tight glycemic control, and the ICU clinician: what are models and how can they affect practice? , 2011, Annals of intensive care.

[4]  Christopher E. Hann,et al.  A minimal model of lung mechanics and model-based markers for optimizing ventilator treatment in ARDS patients , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[5]  Bram W. Smith,et al.  Using physiological models and decision theory for selecting appropriate ventilator settings , 2006, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[6]  Q. Lu,et al.  Assessment of PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions in acute lung injury: are one or three CT sections representative of the entire lung? , 2001, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: an experimental study. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[8]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: a clinical study. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  K. Hickling,et al.  The pressure-volume curve is greatly modified by recruitment. A mathematical model of ARDS lungs. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  M. Sagy,et al.  A comparison among animal models of acute lung injury. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[11]  J. Jansen,et al.  A stable model of respiratory distress by small injections of oleic acid in pigs , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[12]  J. Hoeffel,et al.  Oleic acid lung injury in sheep. , 1986, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  D. Schuster ARDS: clinical lessons from the oleic acid model of acute lung injury. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.