An investigation into HFC MAC protocols: Mechanisms, implementation, and research issues

This study comprehensively reviews two HFC MAC protocols: Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications (DOCSIS) and IEEE 802.14a. DOCSIS was approved by the ITU as a standard and is supported by many vendors. However, IEEE 802.14a remains a draft due to the delayed standardization process. After briefly introducing the features of HFC networks, the basic operations and mechanisms of these two MAC protocols are then examined. Both standards view an upstream channel as a stream of minislots and have similar mechanisms for upstream bandwidth management, virtual queue, downstream in MPEG-2 format, data-linklayer security, and ranging. However, the standards adopt different mechanisms for upstream access modes, QoS support, and collision resolution. Moreover, the implementation issues over hardware and software design for DOCSIS networks are investigated. This work also identifies the research issues in HFC MAC protocols, particularly allocation and scheduling issues.

[1]  Philippe Robert,et al.  Differentiated admission control in large networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[2]  Kwang-Cheng Chen,et al.  A dynamic control scheme for the IEEE 802.14 draft MAC protocol over CATV/HFC networks , 1998, IEEE Communications Letters.

[3]  David H. Su,et al.  Differentiated services over cable networks , 1999, Seamless Interconnection for Universal Services. Global Telecommunications Conference. GLOBECOM'99. (Cat. No.99CH37042).

[4]  Nada Golmie,et al.  A review of contention resolution algorithms for IEEE 802.14 networks , 1999, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  P. Tzerefos,et al.  Performance characterisation of the MCNS DOCSIS 1.0 CATV protocol with prioritised first come first served scheduling , 1999, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[6]  Nada Golmie,et al.  ATM Traffic Control in Hybrid Fiber-Coax Networks - Problems and Solutions , 1999, Comput. Commun..

[7]  Frank Yeong-Sung Lin,et al.  Optimal real-time admission control algorithms for the video-on-demand (VOD) service , 1998, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[8]  Kai-Yeung Siu,et al.  QoS support for integrated services over CATV , 1999, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[9]  Nada Golmie,et al.  A comparison of MAC protocols for hybrid fiber/coax networks: IEEE 802.14 vs. MCNS , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311).

[10]  Nada Golmie,et al.  A priority scheme for the IEEE 802.14 MAC protocol for hybrid fiber-coax networks , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE INFOCOM '98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century (Cat. No.98.

[11]  S. Varma.  Support for ATM traffic classes in HFC networks , 1996, Proceedings of ICC/SUPERCOMM '96 - International Conference on Communications.

[12]  Philippe Flajolet,et al.  Q -ary collision resolution algorithms in random-access systems with free or blocked channel access , 1985, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  F. Abi-Nassif,et al.  Offered load estimation in a multimedia cable network system , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311).

[14]  Ying-Dar Lin,et al.  Allocation and scheduling algorithms for IEEE 802.14 and MCNS in hybrid fiber coaxial networks , 1998 .

[15]  Ying-Dar Lin,et al.  Statistically optimized minislot allocation for initial and collision resolution in hybrid fiber coaxial networks , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Mike St. Johns.  Radio Frequency (RF) Interface Management Information Base for MCNS/DOCSIS compliant RF interfaces , 1999, RFC.