Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth.

BACKGROUND When a woman has had a previous caesarean birth, there are two options for her care in a subsequent pregnancy: planned elective repeat caesarean or planned vaginal birth. While there are risks and benefits for both planned elective repeat caesarean birth and planned vaginal birth after caesarean, current sources of information are limited to non-randomised cohort studies. Studies designed in this way have significant potential for bias and consequently conclusions based on these results are limited in their reliability and should be interpreted with caution. OBJECTIVES To assess, using the best available evidence, the benefits and harms of a policy of planned elective repeat caesarean section with a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean section for women with a previous caesarean birth. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (24 June 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004), and PubMed (1966 to 24 June 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes in mothers and babies who planned a repeat elective caesarean section with outcomes in women who planned a vaginal birth, where a previous birth had been by caesarean. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS There were no randomised controlled trials identified. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS Planned elective repeat caesarean section and planned vaginal birth after caesarean section for women with a prior caesarean birth are both associated with benefits and harms. Evidence for these care practices is drawn from non-randomised studies, associated with potential bias. Any results and conclusions must therefore be interpreted with caution. Randomised controlled trials are required to provide the most reliable evidence regarding the benefits and harms of both planned elective repeat caesarean section and planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth.

[1]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: preliminary data for 2005. , 2006, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[2]  Steve N Caritis,et al.  Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Dodd,et al.  Vaginal birth after Caesarean versus elective repeat Caesarean for women with a single prior Caesarean birth: A systematic review of the literature , 2004, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[4]  P. Nygren,et al.  Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. , 2004, Birth.

[5]  M. McDonagh,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). , 2003, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[6]  J. Pell,et al.  Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Yu Wang,et al.  Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  E. Hutton,et al.  Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  J. Lumley,et al.  Vaginal births after Caesarean (VBAC): a population study. , 2000, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[11]  L. Kozak,et al.  U.S. cesarean and VBAC rates stalled in the mid-1990s. , 2000, Birth.

[12]  M. Permezel,et al.  Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study , 2000 .

[13]  F. Barros,et al.  Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. , 1999, BMJ.

[14]  J. Mastrobattista.  Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[15]  C. Juzi,et al.  Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation , 1999 .

[16]  B. Sachs,et al.  The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  D. Waller,et al.  Umbilical Cord Blood pH After Prior Cesarean Delivery , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  M. McMahon,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean. , 1998, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  H. Minakami,et al.  Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery: Results in 310 Pregnancies , 1998, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[20]  M. Boulvain,et al.  Trial of labour after caesarean section in sub‐Saharan Africa: ameta‐analysis , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  A. Fanaroff,et al.  Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. , 1997, Pediatrics.

[22]  B. Flamm.  Once a cesarean, always a controversy. , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  A F Olshan,et al.  Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Elina Hemminki,et al.  Long-term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  J. Morrison,et al.  Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[26]  B L Flamm,et al.  Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of Labor: A Prospective Multicenter Study , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  Y. Diamant,et al.  The management of labor in women with more than one uterine scar: Is a repeat cesarean section really the only “safe” option? , 1994, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[28]  M. Abitbol,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section: the patient's point of view. , 1993, American family physician.

[29]  C. V. D. Wijden.  Trial of labor in Lesotho , 1993 .

[30]  B. Raynor.  The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small rural community practice. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  V. Parisi,et al.  Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  P. Nyirjesy,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section in rural Zaire. Changing concepts. , 1992, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[33]  L. D. Saunders,et al.  Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital. , 1991, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[34]  T. Elkins,et al.  Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section in a rural West African hospital , 1991, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[35]  C. Paterson,et al.  Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. , 1991, BMJ.

[36]  J. Roosmalen,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section in rural Tanzania , 1991, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[37]  M G Rosen,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  R. Tozin,et al.  [Delivery of pregnant women in Zaire who have previously had cesareans. An analysis of 145 cases]. , 1991, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[39]  António Bugalho,et al.  Management of labour following caesarean section in a developing country. , 1991, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[40]  J. Dickinson,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of indicators for success. , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  A. Picaud,et al.  [Delivery in the scarred uterus. Apropos of 606 cases in 62,193 deliveries]. , 1990, Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique.

[42]  I. Ezeh,et al.  Vaginal delivery in Nigerian women after a previous cesarean section , 1990, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[43]  F. P. Vrouenraets,et al.  The course of delivery after previous cesarean section. , 1990, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[44]  V. Ojo,et al.  Vaginal delivery in first pregnancy following a primary caesarean section. , 2010, Asia-Oceania journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[45]  T. Nolan,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a reappraisal of risk. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[46]  N. Eriksen,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity to elective repeat cesarean section. , 1989, American journal of perinatology.

[47]  M. Ahn,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Trial of labor in women with breech presentation. , 1989, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[48]  N. P. Veridiano,et al.  Vaginal delivery after cesarean section , 1989, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[49]  M. Taylor,et al.  VBAC program in a nurse-midwifery service. Five years of experience. , 1989, Journal of nurse-midwifery.

[50]  M. Ahn,et al.  Twice a Cesarean, Always a Cesarean? , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[51]  N. Gleicher,et al.  Obstetric outcome of patients with more than one previous cesarean section. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  D. Cotton,et al.  Unknown uterine scar and trial of labor. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[53]  D. Ollendorff,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section for arrest of labor: Is success determined by maximum cervical dilatation during the prior labor? , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[54]  A. Poindexter,et al.  Is Vaginal Birth After Two or More Cesarean Sections Safe? , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[55]  X. Muylder.  Vaginal Delivery After Caesarean Section: Is It Safe in a Developing Country? , 1988 .

[56]  C. Jones,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[57]  S. Clark,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[58]  G. Anderson,et al.  Trial of Labor in Previous Cesarean Section Patients, Excluding Classical Cesarean Sections , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  B. Flamm,et al.  Oxytocin During Labor After Previous Cesarean Section: Results of a Multicenter Study , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[60]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Predictors of vaginal delivery in patients with a previous cesarean section, who require oxytocin. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[61]  B. Finley,et al.  Emergent cesarean delivery in patients undergoing a trial of labor with a transverse lower-segment scar. , 1986, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[62]  S. Gabbe,et al.  An evaluation of the relative risks of a trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section. , 1986, American journal of perinatology.

[63]  Mann Li,et al.  Vaginal delivery after cesarean section: a five-year study. , 1985 .

[64]  J. Phelan,et al.  Previous cesarean section: the risks and benefits of oxytocin usage in a trial of labor. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[65]  R. Paul,et al.  Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[66]  A. Graham.  Trial labor following previous cesarean section. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[67]  J. Dwyer,et al.  Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean section in 1983 , 1984, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[68]  C. Dunnett,et al.  Vaginal delivery following cesarean section: use of oxytocin augmentation and epidural anesthesia with internal tocodynamic and internal fetal monitoring. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[69]  G. Eglinton,et al.  Previous cesarean section and trial of labor. Factors related to uterine dehiscence. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[70]  S. Clark,et al.  Previous cesarean birth. Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[71]  S. Yeh,et al.  Postterm pregnancy after previous cesarean section. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[72]  S. Clark,et al.  Vaginal delivery after cesarean section in women with unknown types of uterine scar. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[73]  G. Eglinton,et al.  Oxytocin use during a trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean section. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[74]  R. Paul,et al.  Outcome of a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. , 1984, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[75]  Mahan Cs,et al.  Factors associated with successful vaginal delivery after cesarean section. , 1983, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[76]  J N Martin,et al.  Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[77]  J. Narone,et al.  Outcome of labor following previous cesarean section , 1983, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[78]  R. Porreco,et al.  Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[79]  Walton Sm.  The antenatal and intrapartum management of patients with previous caesarean section scars. , 1978 .

[80]  R. Cosgrove.  Management of pregnancy and delivery following cesarean section. , 1951, Journal of the American Medical Association.