The effect of guided and free navigation on spatial memory in mixed reality

The role of active and passive navigation strategies on human spatial cognition is not well understood. One problem in addressing this question is that combining free movement with controlled stimulus conditions in navigation tasks is difficult to achieve. We have constructed a unique mixed reality space that answers this challenge. In our experiment we expose human subjects to a virtual house where they can navigate following two different protocols: guided or free navigation. We want to assess how navigation mode affects spatial memory. Our results show that the participants that were assigned to the guided navigation condition display higher spatial memory performance, as opposed to those assigned to the free navigation paradigm.

[1]  Tobi Delbrück,et al.  An Investigation of Collective Human Behavior in Large-Scale Mixed Reality Spaces , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[2]  Aleksander Väljamäe,et al.  Quantifying human subjective experience and social interaction using the eXperience Induction Machine , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  E. D. Haan,et al.  Varieties of human spatial memory: a meta-analysis on the effects of hippocampal lesions , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  J. Loomis,et al.  Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Ekaterina P. Volkova,et al.  The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Interaction mapping affects spatial memory and the sense of presence when navigating in a virtual environment , 2010, TEI.

[8]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Validating Presence by Relying on Recollection: Human Experience and Performance in the Mixed Reality System XIM , 2008 .

[10]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A Novel Brain-Based Approach for Multi-Modal Multi- Target Tracking in a Mixed Reality Space , 2007 .

[11]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning , 2011, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[12]  Giuliano Geminiani,et al.  Active and passive spatial learning in a complex virtual environment: The effect of effcient exploration , 2002 .

[13]  Jônatas Manzolli,et al.  The eXperience Induction Machine: A New Paradigm for Mixed-Reality Interaction Design and Psychological Experimentation , 2010, The Engineering of Mixed Reality Systems.

[14]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  Jônatas Manzolli,et al.  VR-RoBoser: real-time adaptive sonification of virtual environments based on avatar behavior , 2007, NIME '07.

[16]  Steve Pettifer,et al.  Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  Ulysses Bernardet.  The eXperience Induction Machine and its Role in the Research on Presence , 2007 .

[18]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks , 2006, TCHI.

[19]  Tobi Delbrück,et al.  A tactile luminous floor for an interactive autonomous space , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  Virtual Reality in Wayfinding Studies , 2008 .

[21]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  PASAR: An integrated model of prediction, anticipation, sensation, attention and response for artificial sensorimotor systems , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[23]  Oli Mival,et al.  Designing blended spaces , 2012, BCS HCI.