Neuroticism and conscientiousness respectively constrain and facilitate short‐term plasticity within the working memory neural network

Individual differences in cognitive efficiency, particularly in relation to working memory (WM), have been associated both with personality dimensions that reflect enduring regularities in brain configuration, and with short‐term neural plasticity, that reflects task‐related changes in brain connectivity. To elucidate the relationship of these two divergent mechanisms, we tested the hypothesis that personality dimensions, which reflect enduring aspects of brain configuration, inform about the neurobiological framework within which short‐term, task‐related plasticity, as measured by effective connectivity, can be facilitated or constrained. As WM consistently engages the dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC), parietal (PAR), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), we specified a WM network model with bidirectional, ipsilateral, and contralateral connections between these regions from a functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset obtained from 40 healthy adults while performing the 3‐back WM task. Task‐related effective connectivity changes within this network were estimated using Dynamic Causal Modelling. Personality was evaluated along the major dimensions of Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Only two dimensions were relevant to task‐dependent effective connectivity. Neuroticism and Conscientiousness respectively constrained and facilitated neuroplastic responses within the WM network. These results suggest individual differences in cognitive efficiency arise from the interplay between enduring and short‐term plasticity in brain configuration. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4158–4163, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  P. Goldman-Rakic Cellular basis of working memory , 1995, Neuron.

[3]  Bradford C. Dickerson,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of personality in the elderly , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Wechsler Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. , 1955 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Gray,et al.  Personality Predicts Brain Responses to Cognitive Demands , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Modelling neural correlates of working memory: A coordinate-based meta-analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Michael Okun,et al.  The Subthreshold Relation between Cortical Local Field Potential and Neuronal Firing Unveiled by Intracellular Recordings in Awake Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Changes in Brain Network Efficiency and Working Memory Performance in Aging , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Thomas W. Mühleisen,et al.  5-HTTLPR/rs25531 polymorphism and neuroticism are linked by resting state functional connectivity of amygdala and fusiform gyrus , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  A. Laird,et al.  Gender differences in working memory networks: A BrainMap meta-analysis , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[13]  P. McGuire,et al.  Approaching a network connectivity-driven classification of the psychosis continuum: a selective review and suggestions for future research , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  J. Gray,et al.  Testing Predictions From Personality Neuroscience , 2010, Psychological science.

[15]  Aron K Barbey,et al.  The role of executive function and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the expression of neuroticism and conscientiousness , 2014, Social neuroscience.

[16]  Peter Kirsch,et al.  Induction and quantification of prefrontal cortical network plasticity using 5 Hz rTMS and fMRI , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[17]  D. Barch,et al.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory: Relevance to CNTRICS and Schizophrenia , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex—An Update Time Is of the Essence , 2001, Neuron.

[19]  S. Frangou A systems neuroscience perspective of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. , 2014, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[20]  Friston,et al.  TEN SIMPLE RULES FOR DYNAMIC CAUSAL MODELLING , 2009 .

[21]  A. Gevins,et al.  Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Satoru Otani,et al.  Functional and Dysfunctional Synaptic Plasticity in Prefrontal Cortex: Roles in Psychiatric Disorders , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  J. Schinka,et al.  Research Validity Scales for the NEO-PI-R: Additional Evidence for Reliability and Validity , 2001, Journal of personality assessment.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: current state and future extensions , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Behavior-dependent short-term assembly dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  The five factors of personality and regional cortical variability in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[29]  J. Flynn,et al.  Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[30]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of extraversion and neuroticism. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  S. Frangou,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of load‐dependent modulation of effective connectivity within the verbal working memory network , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[32]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Book Review: Gain Modulation in the Central Nervous System: Where Behavior, Neurophysiology, and Computation Meet , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[33]  Anders M. Fjell,et al.  Neuronal correlates of the five factor model (FFM) of human personality: Multimodal imaging in a large healthy sample , 2013, NeuroImage.

[34]  Patrick Butler,et al.  Prospective Memory, Personality, and Working Memory: A Formal Modeling Approach. , 2015, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie.

[35]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.