Model of cell electrofusion. Membrane electroporation, pore coalescence and percolation.

High electric field impulses (1-20 kV/cm, 1-20 microseconds) may trigger fusion between adhering cells or lipid vesicles (electrofusion). In this paper a qualitative model of electrofusion is proposed consistent with both electron and light microscopic data. Electrofusion is considered as a multistep process comprising tight membrane-contact formation, membrane electroporation as well as an alternating series of subsequent fast collective and slow diffusive fusion stages. The following sequence of steps is suggested: The electric field pulse enforces (via polarization) a tight contact between the membranes of the cells or vesicles to be fused. During tight-contact formation between the opposing membrane surfaces the membrane-adherent water layers are partially squeezed out from the intermembraneous space. Pores are formed in the double membrane contact area (electroporation) involving lateral diffusion and rotation of the lipid molecules in both adhering membrane parts. With increasing pore density, pore-pore interactions lead to short-range coalescence of double membrane pores resulting in ramified cracks; especially small tongues and loops are formed. At supercritical pore density long-range coalescence of the pores occurs (percolation) producing one large double membrane loop (or tongue) and subsequently one large hole in the contact area. After switching off the electric field, the smaller pores, tongues and loops reseal and water flows back into the intermembraneous space of the double membrane in the contact area. As a consequence of the increasing membrane-membrane separation due to water backflow, cooperative rounding of the edges of remaining larger tongues and holes occurs. This results in the formation of an intercellular cytoplasm bridge (channel) concomitant with the disappearance of the contact line between the fusing cells. The membrane parts surrounded by continuous loop-like cracks may separate from the system and may finally form vesicles. Our electrofusion model comprises a strong linkage between the membrane pore formation by high electric fields (electroporation) and the process of electrofusion. Additionally, both pore-pore interactions as well as protein-protein interactions in the contact area of the fusing cells are explicitly introduced. The model provides a qualitative molecular description of basic experimental observations such as the production of membrane fragments, of smaller inside-out vesicles and the formation of larger intercellular cytoplasm bridges.

[1]  Shunnosuke Abe,et al.  Induction of cell fusion of plant protoplasts by electrical stimulation , 1979 .

[2]  T. Tsong,et al.  Reversible and irreversible modification of erythrocyte membrane permeability by electric field. , 1985, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[3]  R. Benz,et al.  The resealing process of lipid bilayers after reversible electrical breakdown. , 1981, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  L. Bata Advances in liquid crystal research and applications , 1982 .

[5]  E. Neumann,et al.  Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology , 1989, Springer US.

[6]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Electric field‐induced fusion of large liposomes from natural and polymerizable lipids , 1982 .

[7]  T. E. Thompson,et al.  Fusion of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles at 4 degrees C. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[8]  Michael E. Fisher,et al.  Excluded-Volume Problem and the Ising Model of Ferromagnetism , 1959 .

[9]  A. Sowers Fusion of mitochondrial inner membranes by electric fields produces inside-out vesicles. Visualization by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. , 1983, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  Y. Suezaki Thermodynamic interrelation between the stability of black lipid membranes and bilayer vesicles in solution , 1980 .

[11]  A E Sowers,et al.  A long-lived fusogenic state is induced in erythrocyte ghosts by electric pulses , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  D. Exerowa,et al.  Nucleation mechanism of rupture of newtonian black films. I. Theory , 1980 .

[13]  M. Lieber,et al.  Electropore diameters, lifetimes, numbers, and locations in individual erythrocyte ghosts , 1986, FEBS letters.

[14]  T. P. Stewart,et al.  Correlative statistical analysis and computer modelling of intramembraneous particle distributions in human erythrocyte membranes. , 1979, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  E. Neumann,et al.  Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[16]  H. Fricke,et al.  The Electric Permittivity of a Dilute Suspension of Membrane‐Covered Ellipsoids , 1953 .

[17]  Michael E. Fisher,et al.  Critical Probabilities for Cluster Size and Percolation Problems , 1961 .

[18]  Scott Kirkpatrick,et al.  An introduction to percolation theory , 1971 .

[19]  T. Tsong,et al.  Voltage-induced pore formation and hemolysis of human erythrocytes. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  K. Binder,et al.  Monte Carlo study of the surface area of liquid droplets , 1972 .

[21]  J. Weaver,et al.  Transient aqueous pores in bilayer membranes: A statistical theory , 1986 .

[22]  J. Teissié,et al.  Fusion of mammalian cells in culture is obtained by creating the contact between cells after their electropermeabilization. , 1986, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[23]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Evidence for a symmetrical uptake of fluorescent dyes through electro‐permeabilized membranes of Avena mesophyll protoplasts , 1985 .

[24]  G. Vanderkooi,et al.  Evidence for boundary lipid in membranes. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Harvey Scher,et al.  Critical Density in Percolation Processes , 1970 .

[26]  S. Snyder,et al.  Monoclonal antibody production by receptor-mediated electrically induced cell fusion , 1984, Nature.

[27]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Effects of high electric fields on micro-organisms. 3. Lysis of erythrocytes and protoplasts. , 1968, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  R. Rand Interacting phospholipid bilayers: measured forces and induced structural changes. , 1981, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[29]  M. R. Tarasevich,et al.  246 - Electric breakdown of bilayer lipid membranes I. The main experimental facts and their qualitative discussion , 1979 .

[30]  J. Teissié,et al.  Electric pulse-induced fusion of 3T3 cells in monolayer culture. , 1982, Science.

[31]  H. Berg 500—Biological implications of electric field effects: Part V.Fusion of blastomeres and blastocysts of mouse embryos , 1982 .

[32]  J. Teissié,et al.  Electrofusion of spermine‐treated plant protoplasts , 1984 .

[33]  A E Sowers,et al.  Movement of a fluorescent lipid label from a labeled erythrocyte membrane to an unlabeled erythrocyte membrane following electric-field-induced fusion. , 1985, Biophysical journal.

[34]  W. Webb,et al.  Optical imaging of cell membrane potential changes induced by applied electric fields. , 1986, Biophysical journal.

[35]  H. P. Schwan,et al.  Interactions between electromagnetic fields and cells , 1985 .

[36]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Transcellular ion flow in Escherichia coli B and electrical sizing of bacterias. , 1973, Biophysical journal.

[37]  H. Berg,et al.  Microbiological implications of electric field effects. III. Stimulation of yeast protoplast fusion by electric field pulses. , 1981, Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Mikrobiologie.

[38]  E. Neumann,et al.  Stochastic model for electric field-induced membrane pores. Electroporation. , 1984, Biophysical chemistry.

[39]  J Bernhardt,et al.  On the generation of potential differences across the membranes of ellipsoidal cells in an alternating electrical field , 1973, Biophysik.

[40]  J. W. Essam,et al.  Percolation theory , 1980 .

[41]  Ulrich Zimmermann,et al.  Dielectric Breakdown of Cell Membranes , 1974 .