Rapid and potentially low-cost process techniques are analyzed and successfully applied toward the fabrication of high-efficiency monocrystalline Si solar cells. First, a methodology for achieving high-quality screen-printed (SP) contacts is developed to achieve fill factors (FF's) of 0.785-0.795 on monocrystalline Si. Second, rapid emitter formation is accomplished by diffusion under tungsten halogen lamps in both beltline and rapid thermal processing (RTP) systems (instead of in a conventional infrared furnace). Third, a combination of SP aluminum and RTP is used to form an excellent back surface field (BSF) in 2 min to achieve an effective back surface recombination velocity (S/sub eff/) of 200 cm/s on 2.3 /spl Omega/-cm Si. Next, a novel dielectric passivation scheme (formed by stacking a plasma silicon nitride film on top of a rapid thermal oxide layer) is developed that reduces the surface recombination velocity (S) to approximately 10 cm/s on the 1.3 /spl Omega/-cm p-Si surface. The essential feature of the stack passivation scheme is its ability to withstand short 700-850/spl deg/C anneal treatments (like the ones used to fire SP contacts) without degradation in S. The stack also lowers the emitter saturation current density (J/sub oe/) of 40 and 90 /spl Omega//sq emitters by a factor of three and ten, respectively, compared to no passivation. Finally, the above individual processes are integrated to achieve (1) >19% efficient solar cells with emitter and Al-BSF formed by RTP and contacts formed by vacuum evaporation and lift-off, (2) 17% efficient manufacturable cells with emitter and Al-BSF formed in a beltline furnace and contacts formed by SP, and (3) 17% efficient gridded-back contact (bifacial) cells with surface passivation accomplished by the stack and gridded front and back contacts formed by SP and cofiring.
[1]
Ajeet Rohatgi,et al.
An optimized rapid aluminum back surface field technique for silicon solar cells
,
1999
.
[2]
Martin A. Green,et al.
Twenty‐four percent efficient silicon solar cells with double layer antireflection coatings and reduced resistance loss
,
1995
.
[3]
L. Terman.
An investigation of surface states at a silicon/silicon oxide interface employing metal-oxide-silicon diodes
,
1962
.
[4]
K. Iniewski,et al.
Technical Method of Determination of the Interface Trap Density
,
1985,
May 16.
[5]
How Rapid Isothermal Processing Can be a Dominant Semiconductor Processing Technology in the 21st Century
,
1996
.
[6]
J. Szlufcik,et al.
Latest efficiency results with the screenprinting technology and comparison with the buried contact structure
,
1994,
Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion - WCPEC (A Joint Conference of PVSC, PVSEC and PSEC).
[7]
W. R. Runyan.
Semiconductor Measurements and Instrumentation
,
1975
.
[8]
L. Chalfoun.
Process optimization of alloyed aluminum backside contacts for silicon solar cells
,
1996
.
[9]
F. M. Roberts,et al.
The controlling factors in semiconductor large area alloying technology
,
1968
.