EUV vote-taking lithography: crazy... or not?

Vote-taking lithography is a method for mitigating mask defects, which has been applied in the 1980’s to enhance yield. Vote-taking sums up N different mask images with identical content, each at 1/N dose, to mitigate the defects on each individual mask. The fundamental assumption is that the mask defects do not correlate in position from mask to mask, and so each individual defect will be blended with good images from the other N-1 masks. Vote-taking has recently been brought under the attention again for consideration in EUV lithography, where it might provide a temporary solution for situations in which the defectivity conditions are not yet meeting expectations. This paper provides a thorough experimental assessment of the implementation of vote-taking, and discusses its pro’s and con’s. Based on N=4 vote-taking, we demonstrate the capability to mitigate different types of mask defects. Additionally, we found that blending different mask images brings clear benefit to the imaging, and provide experimental confirmation of improved local CDU and intra-field CDU, reduction of stochastic failures, improved overlay, ... Finally, we perform dedicated throughput calculations based on the qualification performance of ASML’s NXE:3400B scanner. This work must be seen in the light of an open-minded search for options to optimally enable and implement EUV lithography. While defect-free masks and EUV pellicles are without argument essential for most of the applications, we investigate whether some applications could benefit from vote-taking.

[1]  Ming Mao,et al.  SAQP and EUV block patterning of BEOL metal layers on IMEC's iN7 platform , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  D.H. Dameron,et al.  Improvement of mask-limited yield with a vote-taking lithographic scheme , 1984, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[3]  Rik Jonckheere Overcoming EUV mask blank defects: what we can, and what we should , 2017, Photomask Japan.

[4]  Mark van de Kerkhof,et al.  Enabling sub-10nm node lithography: presenting the NXE:3400B EUV scanner , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Chong-Cheng Fu,et al.  Characterization Of Voting Suppression Of Optical Defects Through Simulation , 1988, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Scott Halle,et al.  Toward defect guard-banding of EUV exposures by full chip optical wafer inspection of EUV mask defect adders , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Peter De Bisschop Stochastic effects in EUV lithography: random, local CD variability, and printing failures , 2017 .

[8]  Anthony Yen EUV Lithography: From the Very Beginning to the Eve of Manufacturing , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Mark van de Kerkhof,et al.  NXE pellicle: offering a EUV pellicle solution to the industry , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Chong-Cheng Fu,et al.  Elimination Of Mask-Induced Defects With Vote-Taking Lithography , 1986, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Nakgeuon Seong,et al.  Focus drilling for increased process latitude in high-NA immersion lithography , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Obert Wood,et al.  Vote-taking for EUV lithography: a radical approach to mitigate mask defects , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Ted Liang,et al.  EUV progress toward HVM readiness , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Renzo Capelli,et al.  Actinic review of EUV masks: performance data and status of the AIMS EUV System , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[15]  R. W. E. van de Kruijs,et al.  Pellicle films supporting the ramp to HVM with EUV , 2017, Photomask Technology.

[16]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[17]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  Comparing positive and negative tone development process for printing the metal and contact layers of the 32- and 22-nm nodes , 2010 .

[18]  Hans Meiling,et al.  EUV for HVM: towards an industrialized scanner for HVM NXE3400B performance update , 2018, Advanced Lithography.