Toward a Continuous Modeling of French Prosodic Structure: Using Acoustic Features to Predict Prominence Location and Prominence Degree

The aim of this paper is to present a tool developed in order to generate French rhythmical structure semi-automatically, without taking grammatical cues into account. On the basis of a phonemic alignment, the software first locates prominent syllables by considering basic acoustic features such as F0, duration and silent pause. It then assigns a degree of prominence to each syllable identified. The estimation of this degree results from a computation of the values of silent pause, relative duration and height averages used for prominence detection in the first step. The second part of the article presents an experiment conducted in order to validate the algorithm’s performances, by comparing the predictions of the software with a continuous manual coding carried out by four annotators on a 4-minute stretch of corpus (788 syllables) involving read aloud speech, map task and spontaneous dialogue. The performance of the algorithm is encouraging: a Fleiss’ kappa calculation estimates the rate at 0.8, and a correlation agreement calculation at 91%, in the best cases. Index Terms: prominence, automatic detection, degree of prominence, prosodic structure, French.

[1]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[3]  A. Prince,et al.  On stress and linguistic rhythm , 1977 .

[4]  Anne Lacheret,et al.  A corpus-based learning method for prominence detection in spontaneous speech , 2009 .

[5]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic , 1996, CL.

[6]  Mathieu Avanzi,et al.  Introduction: Regards croisés sur la prosodie du français – des données à la modélisation , 2011, Journal of French Language Studies.

[7]  D. House Tonal perception in speech , 1990 .

[8]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French , 1987 .

[9]  Jean-Philippe Goldman,et al.  EasyAlign: An Automatic Phonetic Alignment Tool Under Praat , 2011, INTERSPEECH.

[10]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[11]  M. Avanzi,et al.  Is there a prosodic difference between left-dislocated and heavy subjects? evidence from spontaneous French , 2010, Speech Prosody 2010.

[12]  J. Pierrehumbert The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[13]  J. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[14]  Nicole Dehé,et al.  Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[15]  Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie,et al.  Phonological Phrasing and Accentuation in French , 1996 .

[16]  Caroline L. Smith Naïve listeners ’ perceptions of French prosody compared to the predictions of theoretical models , 2010 .

[17]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[18]  M. Rossi,et al.  La prosodie du français , 1999 .