Soft Sweeps III: The Signature of Positive Selection from Recurrent Mutation

Polymorphism data can be used to identify loci at which a beneficial allele has recently gone to fixation, given that an accurate description of the signature of selection is available. In the classical model that is used, a favored allele derives from a single mutational origin. This ignores the fact that beneficial alleles can enter a population recurrently by mutation during the selective phase. In this study, we present a combination of analytical and simulation results to demonstrate the effect of adaptation from recurrent mutation on summary statistics for polymorphism data from a linked neutral locus. We also analyze the power of standard neutrality tests based on the frequency spectrum or on linkage disequilibrium (LD) under this scenario. For recurrent beneficial mutation at biologically realistic rates, we find substantial deviations from the classical pattern of a selective sweep from a single new mutation. Deviations from neutrality in the level of polymorphism and in the frequency spectrum are much less pronounced than in the classical sweep pattern. In contrast, for levels of LD, the signature is even stronger if recurrent beneficial mutation plays a role. We suggest a variant of existing LD tests that increases their power to detect this signature.

[1]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. , 2000, Genetics.

[2]  J. Pritchard,et al.  A Map of Recent Positive Selection in the Human Genome , 2006, PLoS biology.

[3]  M. Nachman,et al.  Genome scans of DNA variability in humans reveal evidence for selective sweeps outside of Africa. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  D. Schluter,et al.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  R. ffrench-Constant,et al.  World‐wide survey of an Accord insertion and its association with DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[6]  F. Depaulis,et al.  Haplotype tests using coalescent simulations conditional on the number of segregating sites. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  F. Tajima Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. , 1989, Genetics.

[8]  J. Hermisson,et al.  Soft Sweeps , 2005, Genetics.

[9]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Gene Losses during Human Origins , 2006, PLoS biology.

[10]  Richard C. Moore,et al.  Darwinian Selection on a Selfing Locus , 2004, Science.

[11]  Thomas Wiehe,et al.  The Effect of Strongly Selected Substitutions on Neutral Polymorphism: Analytical Results Based on Diffusion Theory , 1992 .

[12]  Yun S. Song,et al.  The Hitchhiking Effect on Linkage Disequilibrium Between Linked Neutral Loci , 2006, Genetics.

[13]  A. Di Rienzo,et al.  Detection of the signature of natural selection in humans: evidence from the Duffy blood group locus. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. , 2005, Genome research.

[15]  N. H. Barton,et al.  COALESCENCE IN A RANDOM BACKGROUND , 2004 .

[16]  A. Wakolbinger,et al.  An approximate sampling formula under genetic hitchhiking , 2005, math/0503485.

[17]  W. Stephan,et al.  Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. , 2002, Genetics.

[18]  Pardis Sabeti,et al.  Spread of an inactive form of caspase-12 in humans is due to recent positive selection. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Richard Durrett,et al.  Approximating selective sweeps. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  Pardis C Sabeti,et al.  Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure , 2002, Nature.

[21]  Molly Przeworski,et al.  How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? , 2006, Genome research.

[22]  Michel Veuille,et al.  Power of Neutrality Tests to Detect Bottlenecks and Hitchhiking , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[23]  H. Innan,et al.  Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Carlos Bustamante,et al.  Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. , 2005, Genome research.

[25]  W. Stephan,et al.  Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  Richard R. Hudson,et al.  Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation , 2002, Bioinform..

[27]  W. Stephan,et al.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach. , 2003, Genetics.

[28]  F. Depaulis,et al.  Detecting Selective Sweeps with Haplotype Tests , 2005 .

[29]  G. Coop,et al.  THE SIGNATURE OF POSITIVE SELECTION ON STANDING GENETIC VARIATION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  N L Kaplan,et al.  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. , 1989, Genetics.

[31]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  A Multilocus Sequence Survey in Arabidopsis thaliana Reveals a Genome-Wide Departure From a Neutral Model of DNA Sequence Polymorphism , 2005, Genetics.

[32]  J. Hermisson,et al.  Soft sweeps II--molecular population genetics of adaptation from recurrent mutation or migration. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  A. Di Rienzo,et al.  Complex signatures of natural selection at the Duffy blood group locus. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[34]  D. Begun,et al.  Linkage Disequilibrium and Recent Selection at Three Immunity Receptor Loci in Drosophila simulans Sequence data from this article have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under accession nos. AY864355, AY864606 and AY870440, AY870441, AY870442, AY870443, AY870444, AY870445, AY870446 , 2005, Genetics.

[35]  Deborah A Nickerson,et al.  Population History and Natural Selection Shape Patterns of Genetic Variation in 132 Genes , 2004, PLoS biology.

[36]  M. Purugganan,et al.  Molecular evidence on the origin and evolution of glutinous rice. , 2002, Genetics.

[37]  F. Depaulis,et al.  Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[38]  A. Caballero,et al.  Variation After a Selective Sweep in a Subdivided Population , 2005, Genetics.

[39]  J. Wall,et al.  Coalescent simulations and statistical tests of neutrality. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  W. Stephan,et al.  Inferring the Demographic History and Rate of Adaptive Substitution in Drosophila , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[41]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. , 1974, Genetical research.

[42]  J. Coyne,et al.  The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  G. McVean,et al.  A genealogical interpretation of linkage disequilibrium. , 2002, Genetics.

[44]  N. Barton Linkage and the limits to natural selection. , 1995, Genetics.

[45]  J K Kelly,et al.  A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations. , 1997, Genetics.

[46]  Molly Przeworski,et al.  The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. , 2002, Genetics.

[47]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Linkage Disequilibrium as a Signature of Selective Sweeps , 2004, Genetics.