Impact of PID on industrial rooftop PV-installations

Potential induced degradation (PID) causes severe damage and financial losses even in modern PV-installations. In Germany, approximately 19% of PV-installations suffer from PID and resulting power loss. This paper focuses on the impact of PID in real installations and how different evaluated time intervals influence the performance ratio (PR) and the determined degradation rate. The analysis focuses exemplarily on a 314 kWp PV-system in the Atlantic coastal climate. IR-imaging is used for identifying PID without operation interruption. Historic electric performance data are available from a monitoring system for several years on system level, string level as well as punctually measured module string IV- curves. The data sets are combined for understanding the PID behavior of this PV plant. The number of PID affected cells within a string varies strongly between 1 to 22% with the string position on the building complex. With increasing number of PID-affected cells the performance ratio decreases down to 60% for daily and monthly periods. Local differences in PID evolution rates are identified. An average PR-reduction of -3.65% per year is found for the PV-plant. On the string level the degradation rate varied up to 8.8% per year depending on the string position and the time period. The analysis reveals that PID generation and evolution in roof-top installations on industrial buildings with locally varying operation conditions can be fairly complex. The results yield that local operating conditions, e.g. ambient weather conditions as well as surrounding conditions on an industrial building, seem to have a dominating impact on the PID evolution rate.

[1]  G. Xing,et al.  An Investigation of Factors Contributing to Potential-Induced Degradation (PID) and Its Countermeasures , 2016 .

[2]  P. Clemens,et al.  Outdoor Electroluminescence Imaging of Crystalline Photovoltaic Modules: Comparative Study between Manual Ground-Level Inspections and Drone-Based Aerial Surveys , 2016 .

[3]  Christian Camus,et al.  aIR-PV-Check of Thin-Film PV-Plants – Detection of PID and Other Defects in CIGS Modules , 2016 .

[4]  Hans Joachim Möller,et al.  Power loss prognosis from thermographic images of PID affected silicon solar modules , 2015 .

[5]  P. Lechner,et al.  PID-Behaviour of Thin-Film- and c-Si PV-Modules , 2013 .

[6]  Jorne Carolus,et al.  Potential-induced degradation (PID); A test campaign at module level , 2016 .

[7]  P. Bentz,et al.  Fast Detection of PID Affected Solar Modules Using Flight Thermography , 2014 .

[8]  Claudia Buerhop,et al.  Faults and infrared thermographic diagnosis in operating c-Si photovoltaic modules: A review of research and future challenges , 2016 .

[9]  Christian Camus,et al.  Analysis of inhomogeneous local distribution of potential induced degradation at a rooftop photovoltaic installation , 2017 .

[10]  O. Breitenstein,et al.  Explanation of potential-induced degradation of the shunting type by Na decoration of stacking faults in Si solar cells , 2014 .

[11]  Thomas Bergner,et al.  Schein oder Sein , 2013 .

[12]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Potential-induced degradation in photovoltaic modules: a critical review , 2017 .

[13]  Christian Camus,et al.  IR-images of PV-modules with potential induced degradation (PID) correlated to monitored string power output , 2016, Optics + Photonics for Sustainable Energy.

[14]  S. Hummel,et al.  Test Method for a More Realistic Simulation of PID Field-Stress , 2014 .

[15]  B. Jaeckel,et al.  Yield Losses of PID-Affected PV Systems - Simulation of Yield Losses Beyond Power Loss , 2016 .

[16]  M. Köhl,et al.  PID Test Round Robins and Outdoor Correlation , 2013 .

[17]  Ryan Smith,et al.  System voltage potential-induced degradation mechanisms in PV modules and methods for test , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[18]  P. Wawer,et al.  Investigations of Potential Induced Degradation of Silicon Photovoltaic Modules , 2011 .