Policy and global change research

The history of the U.S. Global Change Research Program calls into question its sustainability. The Program was established on the presumption that a prerequisite for rational, comprehensive, and cost-effective policy responses is the reduction of scientific uncertainty through comprehensive predictive models. This presumption remains a significant barrier to the renewal of public support for the Program through near-term progress consistent with its mandate ‘to produce information readily usable by policymakers’. This article critiques the use of comprehensive predictive models for policy purposes; proposes one modest alternative to comprehensive predictive models as a means of integrating scientific and non-scientific considerations into recommendations readily usable by policymakers; and places the issue in the broader context of a paradigm shift in U.S. science and technology policy. The purpose is to expedite progress, consistent with the policy mandate, that would help sustain public support for the Program.

[1]  H. Lloyd-Jones,et al.  History and imagination , 1981 .

[2]  Michael J. Rycroft Our Changing Planet , 1997 .

[3]  William Ascher,et al.  The forecasting potential of complex models , 1981 .

[4]  Freeman J. Dyson,et al.  Infinite in All Directions , 1988 .

[5]  R. Monastersky The $1. 5 billion question: Can the US Global Change Research Program deliver on its promises , 1993 .

[6]  Leslie Roberts,et al.  Learning From an Acid Rain Program , 1991 .

[7]  H. Lasswell The world revolution of our time : a framework for basic policy research , 1951 .

[8]  R R Sokal,et al.  Classification: Purposes, Principles, Progress, Prospects , 1974, Science.

[9]  Commoner Politics of energy , 1979 .

[10]  C. G. E. Brown,et al.  Guest Comment: The objectivity crisis , 1992 .

[11]  Ronald D. Brunner Performance as promised. Restructuring the US civil space programme , 1992 .

[12]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications , 1985 .

[13]  A. Miller,et al.  Rethinking the economics of global warming , 1990 .

[14]  Ronald D. Brunner Global climate change: defining the policy problem , 1991 .

[15]  A. Kaplan American ethics and public policy , 1963 .

[16]  James Gleick Chaos: Making a New Science , 1987 .

[17]  Ronald D. Brunner Case-wise policy information systems: redefining poverty , 1986 .

[18]  Michael H. Glantz,et al.  Societal responses to regional climatic change : forecasting by analogy , 1988 .

[19]  J. Schlesinger Systems Analysis and the Political Process , 1968, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[20]  David Collingridge,et al.  David Collingridge: The Management of Scale. Big Organizations, Big Decisions, Big Mistakes , 1992 .

[21]  Roger Schultz,et al.  Verification & validation , 1988 .

[22]  James G. March,et al.  Theories of choice and making decisions , 1982 .

[23]  B. Keepin A technical appraisal of the IIASA energy scenarios , 1984 .

[24]  Bill Keepin,et al.  Review of global energy and carbon dioxide projections , 1986 .

[25]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Image: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect , 1990 .

[26]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[27]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Technical analysis of IIASA energy scenarios , 1984, Nature.

[28]  H. Simon,et al.  Reason in Human Affairs. , 1984 .

[29]  William Ascher,et al.  Political forecasting: The missing link , 1982 .

[30]  A. Barrie Pittock Our Changing Planet: The FY 1990 Research Plan, the U.S. Global Change Research Program and its update our Changing Planet: The FY 1991 U.S. Global Change Research Program , 1990 .

[31]  Alvin M. Weinberg Reflections on Big Science , 1967 .

[32]  A. Rivlin A public policy paradox , 1984 .

[33]  R. L. Henshel,et al.  Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy-Makers and Planners. , 1978 .

[34]  R. Hogarth Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. , 1981 .