Retooling Asian-Pacific teachers to promote creativity, innovation and problem solving in science classrooms

This paper reports on a Professional Learning Programme undertaken by primary school teachers in China that aimed to facilitate the development of ‘adaptive expertise’ in using technology to facilitate innovative science teaching and learning such as that envisaged by the Chinese Ministry of Education’s (2010–2020) education reforms. The study found that the participants made substantial progress towards the development of adaptive expertise manifested not only by advances in the participants’ repertoires of pedagogical content knowledge but also in changes to their levels of confidence and identities as teachers. By the end of the programme, the participants had coalesced into a professional learning community that readily engaged in the sharing, peer review, reuse and adaption, and collaborative design of innovative science learning and assessment activities. The findings from the study indicate that those engaged in the development of Professional Learning Programmes in Asia-Pacific nations need to take cognizance of certain cultural factors and traditions idiosyncratic to the educational systems. This is reflected in the amended set of principles to inform the design and implementation of professional learning programmes presented in the concluding sections of the paper.

[1]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[2]  David A. Schum,et al.  Analysis of Evidence: Frontmatter , 2005 .

[3]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[4]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[5]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching , 2003 .

[6]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[7]  Chris Dede,et al.  Online Professional Development for Teachers: Emerging Models and Methods. , 2006 .

[8]  S. Loucks-Horsley Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[9]  Jason Tan,et al.  Education Reform in Singapore:Towards Greater Creativity and Innovation? (Education Reform for the 21st Century) , 2000 .

[10]  Roy,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning , Education , and Human Activity , 2004 .

[11]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Content Knowledge for Teaching , 2008 .

[12]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[13]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[14]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Bringing Engineering to Elementary School , 2004 .

[15]  Philip Samuel,et al.  Six Thinking Hats , 1988 .

[16]  Lynne Schrum,et al.  Leading 21st Century Schools: Harnessing Technology for Engagement and Achievement , 2009 .

[17]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Cognitive Development , 2014, Front. Young Minds..

[18]  Russell Tytler,et al.  Discourse communities : a framework from which to consider professional development for rural teachers of science and mathematics , 2011 .

[19]  Stephan Freytag,et al.  The New Meaning Of Educational Change , 2016 .

[20]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise , 2003 .

[21]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  Exploring the Cultural Context of School Improvement in Thailand , 2001 .

[22]  Marilyn Gillespie,et al.  Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education , 2007 .

[23]  G. Ramsey,et al.  The Professional Development of Science Teachers. , 1976 .

[24]  Yiannis Gabriel,et al.  Learning Shock , 2005 .

[25]  Jian Liu,et al.  Mathematics Curriculum Reform in the Chinese Mainland: Changes and Challenges , 2010 .

[26]  M. Scardamalia Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .