Dimensional analysis of the earthquake‐induced pounding between adjacent structures

In this paper the seismic response of inelastic structures with unilateral contact is revisited with dimensional analysis. All physically realizable contact types are captured via a non-smooth complementarity approach. The implementation of formal dimensional analysis leads to a condensed presentation of the response and unveils remarkable order even though two different types of non-linearity coexist in the response: the boundary non-linearity of unilateral contact and the inelastic behaviour of the structure itself. It is shown that regardless the intensity and frequency content of the excitation, all response spectra become self-similar when expressed in the appropriate dimensionless terms. The proposed approach hinges upon the notion of the energetic length scale of an excitation which measures the persistence of ground shaking to impose deformation demands. Using the concept of persistency which is defined for excitations with or without distinct pulses, the response is scaled via meaningful novel intensity measures: the dimensionless gap and the dimensionless yield displacement. The study confirms that contact may have a different effect on the response displacements of inelastic structures depending on the spectral region. In adjacent inelastic structures, such as colliding buildings or interacting bridge segments, contact is likely to alter drastically the excitation frequencies’ at which the system is most vulnerable. Finally, it is shown that the proposed approach yields maximum response displacements which correlate very well with the persistency of real earthquakes for a bridge system with considerably complex behaviour.

[1]  Enrique Alarcón,et al.  Pounding force assessment in performance-based design of bridges , 2009 .

[2]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  EFFECT OF POUNDING AND RESTRAINERS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTIPLE-FRAME BRIDGES , 2002 .

[3]  P. D. Panagiotopoulos,et al.  Dynamic and incremental variational inequality principles, differential inclusions and their applications to co-existent phases problems , 1981 .

[4]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Earthquake-resistant concrete structures , 1996 .

[5]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Evaluation of Peak Ground Velocity as a “Good” Intensity Measure for Near-Source Ground Motions , 2004 .

[6]  Anat Ruangrassamee,et al.  Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect , 2001 .

[7]  Shih-Po Chang,et al.  Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures , 2000 .

[8]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Seismic interaction at separation joints of an instrumented concrete bridge , 1995 .

[9]  H. Hao,et al.  Seismic response of multi‐span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion , 2002 .

[10]  K. Spiliopoulos,et al.  An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings , 1992 .

[11]  M. Ala Saadeghvaziri,et al.  Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges , 2008 .

[12]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Seismic Response of Adjacent Buildings with Similar or Different Dynamic Characteristics , 1994 .

[13]  R. O. Davis,et al.  Pounding of buildings modelled by an impact oscillator , 1992 .

[14]  G. I. Barenblatt,et al.  Scaling Phenomena in Fatigue and Fracture , 2004 .

[15]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions , 2000 .

[16]  Murat Dicleli Performance of seismic-isolated bridges with and without elastic-gap devices in near-fault zones , 2008 .

[17]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional response analysis of yielding structures with first‐mode dominated response , 2006 .

[18]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[19]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Pounding of structures modelled as non‐linear impacts of two oscillators , 2001 .

[20]  S. Anagnostopoulos Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes , 1988 .

[21]  Emmanuel A. Maragakis,et al.  Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges , 1987 .

[22]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional analysis of yielding and pounding structures for records without distinct pulses , 2009 .

[23]  Friedrich Pfeiffer,et al.  Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts , 1996 .

[24]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Analysis of the Earthquake Response of a Pounding Oscillator , 2010 .

[25]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes , 1998 .

[26]  L. Sedov Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics , 1960 .

[27]  Elias G. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Analysis of a frictional oblique impact observed in skew bridges , 2010 .

[28]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Analysis of Rigid-Plastic and Elastoplastic Structures under Pulse-Type Excitations , 2004 .

[29]  A. R. Yazdani-Motlagh,et al.  Effects of soil–structure interaction on longitudinal seismic response of MSSS bridges , 2000 .

[30]  R. I. Leine,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Modeling of Various Wooden Toys with Impact and Friction , 2003 .

[31]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Dynamics of Seismic Pounding at Expansion Joints of Concrete Bridges , 1998 .

[32]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Simplified Frequency Content Estimates of Earthquake Ground Motions , 1998 .

[33]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations , 2004 .

[34]  G. I. Barenblatt Scaling: Self-similarity and intermediate asymptotics , 1996 .

[35]  Y. Wen Approximate Method for Nonlinear Random Vibration , 1975 .