Agreement configurations: in defense of “Spec head”

This paper argues that “Spec head” agreement, construed as agreement under left to right Merge is not only a possible agreement configuration, but probably the only agreement configuration, contra Agree (Chomsky 2001).The first part addresses DP internal agreement in Maasai and English. The attested agreement patterns within the Maasai DP fall out from Spec head agreement (Koopman 2003a, 2003b). Attested and unattested agreement patterns fall out from the syntactic hierarchy and the derivation. English long distance agreement in the DP does not support Agree, as agreement can be triggered early in the derivation. The second part of the paper discusses individual cases that have been taken to provide support for Agree. I will show how each case is in fact consistent with Spec head, where the following play an important role: agreement can be triggered under pied-piping, accounting for long distance in Tsez (Polinsky and Potsdam 2001) and agreement can be triggered low in the derivation, as in English existential constructions. A case study of nominative objects in Icelandic implements a Spec head account, and argues on the basis of morphological evidence that these constructions should be analyzed as double nominative constructions, with the verb agreeing with two nominatives. The analysis bears on the nature of inherent case (an argument is presented that inherent case must be decomposed), the structural location of nominative case, clausal structure, silent expletives, default agreement, double agreement and intervention effects. The latter are shown not to bear on Agree.

[1]  H. Sigurðsson.  Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic , 1989 .

[2]  Moira Yip,et al.  Case in Tiers , 1987 .

[3]  Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir,et al.  Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions , 2003 .

[4]  Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.  Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments , 1991 .

[5]  Halldor Armann,et al.  Icelandic non-nominative subjects Facts and implications , 2007 .

[6]  Noam Chomsky.  Some notes on economy of derivation and representation , 2013 .

[7]  H. Sigurðsson.  Icelandic finite verb agreement , 1996 .

[8]  Jan-Wouter Zwart,et al.  Dutch expletives and Small Clause predicate raising , 1992 .

[9]  Andrea Moro,et al.  The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure , 1997 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[11]  Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.  The locus of case and agreement , 2000 .

[12]  Kisongo Maasai,et al.  On the Parallelism of DPs and Clauses : Evidence from Kisongo Maasai * version of 9 / 12 / 2003 , 2003 .

[13]  Ilan Hazout,et al.  The Syntax of Existential Constructions , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[14]  H. Koopman.  On the absence of case chains in Bambara , 1992 .

[15]  A. Zaenen,et al.  Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive , 1985 .

[16]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation , 1992 .

[17]  M. den Dikken,et al.  Nouns and noun phrases , 2003 .

[18]  J. Jónsson.  Clausal architecture and case in Icelandic , 1996 .

[19]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Locality and Left Periphery , 2004 .

[20]  Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson.  We Need (Some Kind of) a Rule of Conjunction Reduction , 1990 .

[21]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[22]  Steven Gene Anderson,et al.  The Grammar of Icelandic verbs in-st , 1990 .

[23]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  The position of subjects , 1991 .

[24]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[25]  J. Maling.  Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles , 2001 .

[26]  Richard S. Kayne.  Parameters and universals , 2000 .

[27]  Halldór Ármann Sigurɖsson.  V1 Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic , 1990 .

[28]  D. Olmsted,et al.  A Maasai Grammar with Vocabulary , 1957 .

[29]  Richard S. Kayne.  Some Notes on Comparative Syntax, with Special Reference to English and French , 2008 .

[30]  Chris Collins,et al.  Vp-Internal structure and object shift in icelandic , 1996 .

[31]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  The Internal and External Distribution of Pronominal DPs , 1999 .

[32]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[33]  G. Cinque.  Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and Its Exceptions , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[34]  Marcel den Dikken,et al.  Predicate Inversion in DP , 1998 .

[35]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  Korean (and Japanese) Morphology from a Syntactic Perspective , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[36]  R. Huddleston,et al.  Nouns and Noun Phrases , 1988 .

[37]  Carson T. Schütze.  INFL in child and adult language : agreement, case and licensing , 1997 .

[38]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[39]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  On Greenberg's Universal 20 and the Semitic DP , 2003 .

[40]  Knut Tarald Taraldsen,et al.  On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic , 1995 .

[41]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[42]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  The Locality of Agreement and the Structure of the DP in Maasai , 2001 .

[43]  A. Zaenen,et al.  Unaccusative, passive and quirky case , 1990 .

[44]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Toward a cartography of subject positions , 2004 .

[45]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  Movement, agreement and case , 1990 .

[46]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[47]  Joan Maling,et al.  The new impersonal construction in Icelandic , 2002 .

[48]  A. Mahajan.  On the A/A''distinction , 1989 .

[49]  Alice C. Andrews.  The VP-complement analysis in modern Icelandic , 1990 .

[50]  Richard S. Kayne.  Facets of Romance past participle agreement , 1989 .