Decision-Making About Genetic Testing Among Women at Familial Risk for Breast Cancer

Objective Recent identification of the breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 and the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 have raised the possibility of clinical genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. This study examined decision-making about future susceptibility testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Based on the transtheoretical model, it was hypothesized that readiness to undergo testing would be related to the ratio between the perceived advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of learning one's susceptibility status. Methods Seventy-four women with one or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer were recruited before a routine mammogram. Participants completed measures assessing readiness to undergo testing, perceived pros and cons of testing, and perceived breast cancer risk. Family history data was used to calculate empiric genetic risk of developing breast cancer. Results Forty-six per cent of participants planned to seek genetic testing as soon as possible, 35% planned to seek testing in the future, and 19% did not plan to seek testing. As expected, greater readiness to undergo testing was associated with a positive decisional balance (pros > cons). Older age and greater perceived risk (but not empiric risk) also were associated with greater readiness. Conclusion The readiness of many women to seek breast cancer susceptibility testing can be attributed, in large part, to their perceptions that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Examination of these perceptions suggests that notification of carrier status may have significant effects on women's psychological well-being and breast cancer surveillance and prevention behaviors.

[1]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  W F Velicer,et al.  Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. King,et al.  Inheritance of human breast cancer: evidence for autosomal dominant transmission in high-risk families. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. King,et al.  Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. , 1990, Science.

[5]  W F Velicer,et al.  Patterns of Change: Dynamic Typology Applied to Smoking Cessation. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  John C. Norcross,et al.  In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. , 1992 .

[7]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[8]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J P Fulton,et al.  Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[10]  D. Easton,et al.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  P. Engstrom,et al.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  F. Collins,et al.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. , 1993, JAMA.

[13]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. , 1994, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[14]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[15]  N Risch,et al.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early‐onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction , 1994, Cancer.

[16]  S. Seal,et al.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. , 1994, Science.

[17]  M. Daly,et al.  Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  R. Croyle,et al.  DNA-Testing for Heritable Breast Cancer Risks: Lessons from Traditional Genetic Counseling , 1994 .

[19]  R. Croyle,et al.  Psychological issues in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  J. Struewing,et al.  Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[21]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychological distress in women with a familial risk of breast cancer , 1995 .

[22]  M. Skolnick,et al.  A collaborative survey of 80 mutations in the BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Implications for presymptomatic testing and screening. , 1995, JAMA.

[23]  C. Lerman,et al.  Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[24]  D. Bentley,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1995, Nature.

[25]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography , 1996 .