An Adaptive Image Quality Assessment Algorithm

An improved algorithm for image quality assessment is presented. First a simple model of human visual system, consisting of a nonlinear function and a 2-D filter, processes the input images. This filter has one user-defined parameter, whose value depends on the reference image. This way the algorithm can adapt to different scenarios. In the next step the average value of locally computed correlation coefficients between the two processed images is found. This criterion is closely related to the way in which human observer assesses image quality. Finally, image quality measure is computed as the average value of locally computed correlation coefficients, adjusted by the average correlation coefficient between the reference and error images. By this approach the proposed measure differentiates between the random and signal dependant distortions, which have different effects on human observer. Performance of the proposed quality measure is illustrated by examples involving images with different types of degradation.

[1]  R. J. Safranek,et al.  A perceptually tuned sub-band image coder with image dependent quantization and post-quantization data compression , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[2]  David L. Neuhoff,et al.  Least-squares model-based halftoning , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Pierre Bretillon,et al.  Objective quality monitoring issues in digital broadcasting networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Image quality assessment based on a degradation model , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Ahmet M. Eskicioglu,et al.  An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Supra-threshold perceptual image coding , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[10]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Liam Murphy,et al.  Subjective assessment of the quality-oriented adaptive scheme , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[13]  Thomas G. Stockham,et al.  Toward the unification of three visual laws and two visual models in brightness perception , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Ravi Sankar,et al.  An algorithm for image quality assessment , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation , 2005 .