Multiple resource limitation: nonequilibrium coexistence of species in a competition model using a synthesizing unit

[1]  U. Feudel,et al.  Resource Competition: A Bifurcation Theory Approach , 2013 .

[2]  A. Wacker,et al.  Multiple resource limitation theory applied to herbivorous consumers: Liebig's minimum rule vs. interactive co-limitation. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[3]  Markus Fischer,et al.  More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[5]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  How far details are important in ecosystem modelling: the case of multi-limiting nutrients in phytoplankton–zooplankton interactions , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  David Bastine,et al.  Dominance patterns of competing phytoplankton groups in the wake of an island , 2010 .

[7]  Stephanie Dutkiewicz,et al.  Patterns of Diversity in Marine Phytoplankton , 2010, Science.

[8]  Yuri A. Kuznetsov,et al.  Continuation of Connecting orbits in 3D-ODES (II) : Cycle-to-Cycle Connections , 2008, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[9]  Matthew J. Hegreness,et al.  Evolution exacerbates the paradox of the plankton , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  University of Groningen Nonequilibrium coexistence in a competition model with nutrient storage , 2008 .

[11]  Yuri A. Kuznetsov,et al.  Continuation of Connecting orbits in 3D-ODES (I): Point-to-Cycle Connections , 2007, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[12]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[13]  Bas Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation , 2005 .

[14]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure , 2005, Biology Letters.

[15]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  DYNAMIC ENERGY BUDGET REPRESENTATIONS OF STOICHIOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS ON POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2004 .

[16]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Enrichment and foodchain stability: the impact of different forms of predator-prey interaction. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  B W Kooi,et al.  Consequences of symbiosis for food web dynamics , 2004, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  Prof. Dr. Ulrich Sommer,et al.  Competition and Coexistence , 2012, Ecological Studies.

[19]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Oscillations and chaos generated by competition for interactively essential resources , 2002, Ecological Research.

[20]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Stoichiometric food quality and herbivore dynamics , 2001 .

[21]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR OSCILLATIONS AND CHAOS GENERATED BY MULTISPECIES COMPETITION , 2001 .

[22]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? , 2001 .

[23]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Fundamental Unpredictability in Multispecies Competition , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[24]  S. Kooijman,et al.  From molecules to ecosystems through dynamic energy budget models. , 2000 .

[25]  J. Huisman,et al.  Coexistence and resource competition , 2000 .

[26]  J. Huisman,et al.  reply: Coexistence and resource competition , 2000, Nature.

[27]  A. Provenzale,et al.  Mesoscale vortices and the paradox of the plankton , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[29]  Simon N. Wood,et al.  Super–sensitivity to structure in biological models , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  B W Kooi,et al.  Resistance of a food chain to invasion by a top predator. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[31]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments , 1998 .

[32]  S. Kooijman,et al.  The Synthesizing Unit as model for the stoichiometric fusion and branching of metabolic fluxes. , 1998, Biophysical chemistry.

[33]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant Allocation and the Multiple Limitation Hypothesis , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Multiple nutrient limitations in ecological models , 1989 .

[35]  J. Wilson,et al.  The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition , 1988 .

[36]  U. Sommer.  The paradox of the plankton: Fluctuations of phosphorus availability maintain diversity of phytoplankton in flow-through cultures’ , 2000 .

[37]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[38]  M. R. Droop,et al.  The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture , 1974, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[39]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  The Dynamics of Nutrient Limitation of Phytoplankton Algae: A Model Reconsidered , 1974 .

[40]  M. Droop.  SOME THOUGHTS ON NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN ALGAE 1 , 1973 .

[41]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[42]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[43]  G. Hardin.  The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.