Reader Variability in Mammography and Its Implications for Expected Utility over the Population of Readers and Cases
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Craig A. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[2] C E Metz,et al. Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates. , 1997, Academic radiology.
[3] H E Rockette,et al. Empiric assessment of parameters that affect the design of multireader receiver operating characteristic studies. , 1999, Academic radiology.
[4] K S Berbaum,et al. Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design. , 1998, Academic radiology.
[5] R. F. Wagner,et al. Study design in the evaluation of breast cancer imaging technologies. , 2000, Academic radiology.
[6] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[7] C A Gatsonis,et al. Regression analysis of correlated receiver operating characteristic data. , 1995, Academic radiology.
[8] S G Baker,et al. Identifying Combinations of Cancer Markers for Further Study as Triggers of Early Intervention , 2000, Biometrics.
[9] E. Burnside,et al. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. , 2001, Clinical breast cancer.
[10] C. Metz,et al. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. , 1996, Radiology.
[11] Stuart G. Baker,et al. A Proposed Design and Analysis for Comparing Digital and Analog Mammography , 2001 .
[12] J A Swets,et al. Variability in the interpretation of mammograms. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.
[13] C. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[14] R. F. Wagner,et al. Assessment of medical imaging and computer-assist systems: lessons from recent experience. , 2002, Academic radiology.
[15] A. Gelfand,et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[16] H. Ishwaran,et al. A general class of hierarchical ordinal regression models with applications to correlated roc analysis , 2000 .
[17] R. F. Wagner,et al. Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 2000, Academic radiology.
[18] R. Wagner,et al. Science is alive and well at the Food and Drug Administration. , 1997, Radiology.
[19] J A Swets,et al. Staging prostate cancer with MR imaging: a combined radiologist-computer system. , 1997, Radiology.
[20] R. F. Wagner,et al. Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities. , 2001, Academic radiology.
[21] K. Berbaum,et al. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.
[22] R. F. Wagner,et al. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations. , 2001, Academic radiology.
[23] Richard Horton,et al. Screening mammography—an overview revisited , 2001, The Lancet.
[24] J. Swets. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.
[25] J A Swets,et al. Enhancing and Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[26] A. Toledano,et al. Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.
[27] K Doi,et al. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. , 1995, Academic radiology.
[28] N. Petrick,et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.
[29] N A Obuchowski,et al. Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. , 1995, Academic radiology.
[30] D B Kopans,et al. Recent issues in breast cancer detection and the premarket approval by the Food and Drug Administration of a US system for breast lesion evaluation: what happened to science? , 1997, Radiology.
[31] R C Zepp,et al. Simple steps for improving multiple-reader studies in radiology. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[32] Craig A. Beam,et al. Reader strategies: variability and error- methodology, findings, and health policy implications from a study of the U.S. population of mammographers , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[33] M. Giger,et al. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. , 1999, Academic radiology.
[34] J. Swets,et al. Assessment of diagnostic technologies. , 1979, Science.
[35] J A Swets,et al. Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.
[36] D. McClish. Analyzing a Portion of the ROC Curve , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[37] Robert F. Wagner,et al. Propagation of reader variability in mammography to the variable expected benefit over the population , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[38] D D Patton,et al. A utility-based model for comparing the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.
[39] Peter C Gøtzsche,et al. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.
[40] J. Swets,et al. Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.
[41] N L Müller,et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. , 1997, Radiology.
[42] Charles E. Metz,et al. Implications of a ''Noisy'' observer to data processing techniques , 1976 .
[43] C. Metz. Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[44] Emily F Conant,et al. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[45] J. Elmore,et al. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[46] A. Morrison,et al. Basic issues in population screening for cancer. , 1980, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[47] J R Beck,et al. Decision-making Studies in Patient Management , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[48] C A Roe,et al. Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation. , 1997, Academic radiology.
[49] R F Wagner,et al. Analysis of uncertainties in estimates of components of variance in multivariate ROC analysis. , 2001, Academic radiology.