How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices

[1]  J. Voss,et al.  Umbrella terms as mediators in the governance of emerging science and technology , 2019, Nanotechnology and Its Governance.

[2]  K. O’Riordan,et al.  The first bite: Imaginaries, promotional publics and the laboratory grown burger , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[3]  A. Grunwald.  The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2016 .

[4]  Christoph Schneider,et al.  Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: the smart grid in the German energy transition , 2016 .

[5]  M. Sand.  Responsibility and Visioneering—Opening Pandora’s Box , 2016, NanoEthics.

[6]  C. Büscher,et al.  “Trust” and “confidence” as socio-technical problems in the transformation of energy systems , 2015, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[7]  Lea Schick,et al.  Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy , 2015 .

[8]  Franziska Engels,et al.  The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition , 2015 .

[9]  A. Grunwald.  Die hermeneutische Erweiterung der Technikfolgenabschätzung , 2015 .

[10]  Tomas Moe Skjølsvold,et al.  Embedding smart energy technology in built environments: A comparative study of four smart grid demonstration projects , 2015 .

[11]  B. Allenby,et al.  A case for systemic environmental analysis of cultured meat , 2015 .

[12]  J. Hocquette,et al.  What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry , 2015 .

[13]  R. Simonsen,et al.  Eating for the Future: Veganism and the Challenge of In Vitro Meat , 2015 .

[14]  C. Schneider,et al.  What about your futures, technology assessment? An essay on how to take the visions of TA seriously, motivated by the PACITA conference , 2015 .

[15]  Oron Catts,et al.  Growing for different ends. , 2014, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[16]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[17]  M. Post.  Cultured beef: medical technology to produce food. , 2014, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[18]  Knud Böhle,et al.  What a Vision: The Artificial Companion. A Piece of Vision Assessment Including an Expert Survey , 2013 .

[19]  Alfred Nordmann,et al.  Visioneering Assessment On the Construction of Tunnel Visions for Technovisionary Research and Policy , 2013 .

[20]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  The Social Dimensions of Energy Transitions , 2013 .

[21]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project , 2013 .

[22]  A. Lösch.  „Vision Assessment“ zu Human-Enhancement-Technologien , 2013 .

[23]  Brit Ross Winthereik,et al.  Innovating Relations - or why smart grid is not too complex for the public , 2013 .

[24]  N. Stephens.  Growing Meat in Laboratories: The Promise, Ontology, and Ethical Boundary-Work of Using Muscle Cells to Make Food , 2013 .

[25]  W. Mccray,et al.  The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future , 2012 .

[26]  A. Grunwald.  Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung , 2012 .

[27]  M. Post.  Cultured meat from stem cells: challenges and prospects. , 2012, Meat science.

[28]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement , 2012 .

[29]  M. Korthals,et al.  Pig towers and in vitro meat: Disclosing moral worlds by design , 2012 .

[30]  Harro van Lente,et al.  Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[31]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Putting the 'smarts' into the smart grid , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[32]  C. Orwat.  Systemic Risks in the Electric Power Infrastructure , 2011 .

[33]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[35]  A. Lösch.  Visual Dynamics: The Defuturization of the Popular “Nano-Discourse” as an Effect of Increasing Economization , 2009 .

[36]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  Sociality with Objects Social Relations in , 2009 .

[37]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics , 2007 .

[38]  Andreas Lösch,et al.  Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: Visionary images as means of communication , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[40]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[41]  Andreas Lösch,et al.  Means of Communicating Innovations. A Case Study for the Analysis and Assessment of Nanotechnology’s Futuristic Visions , 2006 .

[42]  V. Baumans,et al.  The Use of Fetal Bovine Serum: Ethical or Scientific Problem? , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[43]  N. Brown,et al.  Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science , 2000 .

[44]  K. K. Cetina.  German Translation of Sociality with Objects. Social Relations in Postsocial Knowledge Societies , 1998 .

[45]  Damir Novosel,et al.  Grids get smart protection and control , 1997 .

[46]  H. Rheinberger.  Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[47]  U. Hoffmann,et al.  Visions of Technology: Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies , 1996 .

[48]  M. Callon.  Four Models for the Dynamics of Science , 1995 .

[49]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[50]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .