Abstract The relations between data, information and prediction are discussed with reference to a suggested Markov model for forecasting of the structure of scientific activity. A conclusion is that the output of mathematical operations, i.e. the predicted “state” or activity distribution, is not related to the input as a deductive or probabilistic consequence of its real information content, but rather to information attributed to the data by assumptions inherent in the method. This is a general difficulty in futures studies, namely that the openness of explanation of a phenomenon effectively limits the possibilities to extend the understanding of systems behaviour into predictive statements.
[1]
K. Popper.
The Poverty of Historicism
,
1959
.
[2]
Nicholas Rescher,et al.
Discrete State Systems, Markov Chains, and Problems in the Theory of Scientific Explanation and Prediction
,
1963,
Philosophy of Science.
[3]
Eugene Garfield,et al.
THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE
,
1964
.
[4]
B. Vickery,et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE LITERATURE USE IN THE UK AS INDICATED BY CITATIONS
,
1969
.
[5]
Pranas Zunde,et al.
Predictive models of scientific progress
,
1971,
Inf. Storage Retr..