Trends in Bone Marrow Sampling and Core Biopsy Specimen Adequacy in the United States and Canada: A Multicenter Study

Objectives To assess bone marrow (BM) sampling in academic medical centers. Methods Data from 6,374 BM samples obtained in 32 centers in 2001 and 2011, including core length (CL), were analyzed. Results BM included a biopsy (BMB; 93%) specimen, aspirate (BMA; 92%) specimen, or both (83%). The median (SD) CL was 12 (8.5) mm, and evaluable marrow was 9 (7.6) mm. Tissue contraction due to processing was 15%. BMB specimens were longer in adults younger than 60 years, men, and bilateral, staging, and baseline samples. Only 4% of BMB and 2% of BMB/BMA samples were deemed inadequate for diagnosis. BM for plasma cell dyscrasias, nonphysician operators, and ancillary studies usage increased, while bilateral sampling decreased over the decade. BM-related quality assurance programs are infrequent. Conclusions CL is shorter than recommended and varies with patient age and sex, clinical circumstances, and center experience. While pathologists render diagnoses on most cases irrespective of CL, BMB yield improvement is desirable.

[1]  F. Berthold,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization of bone marrow disease assessment and reporting in children with neuroblastoma on behalf of the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria Bone Marrow Working Group , 2017, Cancer.

[2]  H. Stein,et al.  Problems and pitfalls in grading of bone marrow fibrosis, collagen deposition and osteosclerosis – a consensus‐based study , 2016, Histopathology.

[3]  S. Pittaluga,et al.  Discordant bone marrow involvement in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2016, Blood.

[4]  F. Ortuño,et al.  The role of bone marrow biopsy and FDG‐PET/CT in identifying bone marrow infiltration in the initial diagnosis of high grade non‐Hodgkin B‐cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. accuracy in a multicenter series of 372 patients , 2015, American journal of hematology.

[5]  J. Duyster,et al.  Trained clinical nurse specialists proficiently obtain bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies in a nearly painless procedure—a prospective evaluation study , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[6]  Bruce D Cheson,et al.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  T. Habermann,et al.  The utility of restaging bone marrow biopsy in PET‐negative patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and baseline bone marrow involvement , 2014, American journal of hematology.

[8]  M. Linden,et al.  Quality and adequacy of bone marrow samples obtained by the 2-needle technique: the Minnesota experience. , 2014, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

[9]  M. Chauffaille,et al.  Quality control of bone marrow aspirates: Additional steps toward a safer and more efficient procedure , 2014, Cancer.

[10]  S. Rodig,et al.  High concordance in grading reticulin fibrosis and cellularity in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[11]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Impact of Recent Chemotherapy Innovation on the Longevity of Myeloma Patients: U.S. and International Evidence , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[12]  A. Haynes,et al.  Bone marrow trephine biopsy involvement by lymphoma: review of histopathological features in 511 specimens and correlation with diagnostic biopsy, aspirate and peripheral blood findings , 2013, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[13]  A. LaCasce,et al.  Improving the quality of bone marrow assessment , 2013, Cancer.

[14]  A. Al-Ibraheemi,et al.  Comparison between 1-needle technique versus 2-needle technique for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedures. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[15]  H. Amthauer,et al.  [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of bone marrow involvement in children and adolescents with Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. Gascoyne,et al.  Impact of concordant and discordant bone marrow involvement on outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  W. Chan,et al.  Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma with concordant bone marrow involvement has peculiar genomic profile and poor clinical outcome , 2011, Hematological oncology.

[18]  J. Bennett,et al.  Diagnostic criteria to distinguish hypocellular acute myeloid leukemia from hypocellular myelodysplastic syndromes and aplastic anemia: recommendations for a standardized approach , 2009, Haematologica.

[19]  Kristine Roland,et al.  Adequacy of Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsy in a Tertiary Care Center , 2008 .

[20]  A. Porwit,et al.  ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports , 2008, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[21]  B. Shadbolt,et al.  Role of Immunohistochemistry in Staging Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) , 2008, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[22]  T. Reiman,et al.  Concordant but not discordant bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma predicts a poor clinical outcome independent of the International Prognostic Index. , 2007, Blood.

[23]  I. Lampert,et al.  Bone marrow trephine combined with immunohistochemistry is superior to bone marrow aspirate in follow-up of myeloma patients , 2007, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[24]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  P. Mclaughlin,et al.  Follicular lymphoma in staging bone marrow specimens: correlation of histologic findings with the results of flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  H. Deeg,et al.  International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). , 2006, Blood.

[27]  J. Matthews,et al.  The prognostic impact of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma varies according to the degree of infiltration and presence of discordant marrow involvement , 2006, European journal of haematology.

[28]  H. Höfler,et al.  Bone marrow involvement in follicular lymphoma: Comparison of histology and flow cytometry as staging procedures , 2006, Leukemia and Lymphoma.

[29]  D. Arber,et al.  Bone Marrow Biopsy Involvement by Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Frequency of Lymphoma Types, Patterns, Blood Involvement, and Discordance With Other Sites in 450 Specimens , 2005, American Journal of Surgical Pathology.

[30]  L. Depalma,et al.  Comparison of relative value of bone marrow aspirates and bone marrow trephine biopsies in the diagnosis of solid tumor metastasis and Hodgkin lymphoma: institutional experience and literature review. , 2005, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[31]  D. Winfield,et al.  Audit of bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies in multiple myeloma--a single centre study. , 2004, Clinical and laboratory haematology.

[32]  J. Matthews,et al.  Optimum trephine length in the assessment of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  L. Peterson,et al.  Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Hematopoietic Neoplasms of the Bone Marrow , 2002 .

[34]  M. Slovak,et al.  Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination , 2002, Cancer.

[35]  C. de Wolf‐Peeters,et al.  Evaluation of B cell lymphoid infiltrates in bone marrow biopsies by morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[36]  J. Luider,et al.  Bone marrow staging of patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma by flow cytometry , 2000, Cancer.

[37]  B. Roald,et al.  Deterioration in performance in obtaining bone marrow trephine biopsy cores from children. European Neuroblastoma Study Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[38]  C. Fegan,et al.  Trained nurses can obtain satisfactory bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[39]  L. Ettinger,et al.  Comparison of the cellularity and presence of residual leukemia in bone marrow aspirate and biopsy specimens in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at day 7-14 of chemotherapy. , 1997, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[40]  J. Cotelingam,et al.  Comparative utility of diagnostic bone‐marrow components: A 10‐year study , 1997, American journal of hematology.

[41]  R. Chibbar,et al.  Correlation of PCR-detected clonal gene rearrangements with bone marrow morphology in patients with B-lineage lymphomas. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[42]  B. Roald,et al.  Adequacy of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens in children. , 1996, Journal of clinical pathology.

[43]  J. Bennett,et al.  Bone marrow cellularity in myeloid stem cell disorders: impact of age correction. , 1994, Leukemia research.

[44]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[45]  K. McNally,et al.  Audit of bone marrow trephines. , 1992, Journal of clinical pathology.

[46]  S. Roath,et al.  Bone marrow biopsy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1991, Journal of clinical pathology.

[47]  M. Wolf,et al.  Value of bilateral bone marrow biopsy specimens in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.

[48]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Bilateral trephine bone marrow biopsies in lymphoma and other neoplastic diseases. , 1975, Annals of internal medicine.

[49]  C. Coltman,et al.  Comparison of the diagnostic value of bone marrow biopsy and bone marrow aspiration in neoplastic disease , 1974, Journal of clinical pathology.

[50]  Matthew P. Goetz,et al.  NCCN CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN ONCOLOGY , 2019 .

[51]  Z. Ráliš,et al.  Changes in dimensions of large cancellous bone specimens during histological preparation as measured on slabs from human femoral heads , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[52]  J. D. van der Walt,et al.  European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. , 2005, Haematologica.

[53]  J. Stachura,et al.  Adequacy of trephine bone marrow biopsies: the doctor and the patient make a difference. , 2005, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[54]  J. Oosterhuis,et al.  Cervical tissue shrinkage by formaldehyde fixation, paraffin wax embedding, section cutting and mounting , 2004, Virchows Archiv A.

[55]  H. Gralnick,et al.  Frequencies and patterns of bone marrow involvement in non‐hodgkin lymphomas: Observations on the value of bilateral biopsies , 1977, American journal of hematology.