Investigating how college students’ task definitions and plans relate to self-regulated learning processing and understanding of a complex science topic

Abstract Winne and Hadwin (2008) identified four phases of self-regulated learning (SRL) including defining the task, setting goals and making plans, studying (i.e., learning), and adaptation. The vast majority of SRL research has focused on processing during the third phase, studying. In this study, we developed coding rubrics that allowed us to examine how the results of college students’ processing during phases one and two of Winne and Hadwin’s model, task definitions and plans, affected their SRL processing while learning with a hypermedia learning environment (HLE), and their subsequent academic performance. Our findings showed that, on average, participants gained both factual knowledge and integrated conceptual understanding over the course of learning with the HLE. The quality of participants’ task definitions and plans at pretest, as well as their SRL processing during learning, were related to learning outcomes. On average, participants’ task definitions improved from pretest to posttest. The findings from this study and the associated coding methodologies have implications for educational research and practice.

[1]  Daniel C. Moos.  Note-taking while learning hypermedia: Cognitive and motivational considerations , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2006 .

[3]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding , 2008 .

[4]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[5]  Cheryl Mason Bolick,et al.  Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[7]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Environments , 2006 .

[8]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[9]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia , 2004 .

[10]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? , 2004 .

[11]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[12]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  Importance in instructional text: teachers' and students' perceptions of task demands , 2002 .

[13]  R. Azevedo,et al.  A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions , 2007 .

[14]  S. Pieschl.  Metacognitive calibration—an extended conceptualization and potential applications , 2009 .

[15]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool , 2008 .

[16]  Diane Lee Jamieson-Noel.  Exploring Task Definition as a Facet of Self-Regulated Learning , 2004 .

[17]  G.L.M. Schellings,et al.  Signaling task awareness in think-aloud protocols from students selecting relevant information from text , 2011 .

[18]  Gregory Schraw.  Knowledge: Structures and Processes. , 2006 .

[19]  A. Baddeley.  Is working memory still working , 2001 .

[20]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[21]  Jeffrey A. Greene,et al.  Analysis of self-regulated learning processing using statistical models for count data , 2011 .

[22]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Cognitive Processing of Self-Report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean? , 2007 .

[23]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A School-Based Program to Enhance Self-Regulated and Self-Motivated Cycles of Student Learning. , 2004 .

[24]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  The Design of Hypermedia Tools for Learning: Fostering Conceptual Change and Transfer of Complex Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .

[25]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. , 2008 .

[26]  W. McKeachie,et al.  The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire , 2005 .

[27]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system☆☆☆ , 2009 .

[28]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Understanding Complex Systems: Some Core Challenges , 2006 .

[29]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  HyperText/Hypermedia , 1989 .

[30]  Robert E. Beasley,et al.  The Effects of Content-Structure Focusing on Learner Structural Knowledge Acquisition, Retention, and Disorientation in a Hypermedia Environment , 1996 .

[31]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development , 2005 .

[32]  Marcel V. J. Veenman,et al.  The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs? , 2005 .

[33]  F. Hesse,et al.  When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students’ conceptions of educational technology , 2004 .

[34]  A. Renkl,et al.  Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols , 2009 .

[35]  B. Zimmerman.  Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[36]  Yi Pan,et al.  Exploring relations among college students' prior knowledge, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning in a hypermedia environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Studying as self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[38]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Adaptive Content and Process Scaffolding: A key to facilitating students' self-regulated learning with hypermedia , 2011 .

[39]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks , 2006 .

[40]  F. Tuerlinckx,et al.  Task perception as a mediating variable: a contribution to the validation of instructional knowledge. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[41]  J. Elshout,et al.  Thinking aloud: does it affect regulatory processes in learning? , 1993 .

[42]  J. Greene,et al.  Adolescents' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes and Their Relation to Qualitative Mental Model Shifts While Using Hypermedia , 2006, ICLS.

[43]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[44]  B. V. van Hout-Wolters,et al.  Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy , 2006 .

[45]  M. Veenman.  Learning to Self-Monitor and Self-Regulate , 2010 .

[46]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computers as Cognitive Tools: No More Walls , 2000 .

[47]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  A Primer on Maximum Likelihood Algorithms Available for Use With Missing Data , 2001 .

[48]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hypermedia Learning: Issues and Challenges , 2010 .

[49]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: an introduction , 2007 .

[50]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  The Influence of Cognitive Load on Learning from Hypertext , 2000 .

[51]  R. Azevedo.  Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[52]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .

[53]  Deborah L. Butler,et al.  Promoting Effective Task Interpretation as an Important Work Habit: A Key to Successful Teaching and Learning , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.