Modeling and measuring the spatial relation "along": Regions, contours and fuzzy sets

The analysis of spatial relations among objects in an image is an important vision problem that involves both shape analysis and structural pattern recognition. In this paper, we propose a new approach to characterize the spatial relation along, an important feature of spatial configurations in space that has been overlooked in the literature up to now. We propose a mathematical definition of the degree to which an object A is along an object B, based on the region between A and B and a degree of elongatedness of this region. In order to better fit the perceptual meaning of the relation, distance information is included as well. In order to cover a more wide range of potential applications, both the crisp and fuzzy cases are considered. In the crisp case, the objects are represented in terms of 2D regions or 1D contours, and the definition of the alongness between them is derived from a visibility notion and from the region between the objects. However, the computational complexity of this approach leads us to the proposition of a new model to calculate the between region using the convex hull of the contours. On the fuzzy side, the region-based approach is extended. Experimental results obtained using synthetic shapes and brain structures in medical imaging corroborate the proposed model and the derived measures of alongness, thus showing that they agree with the common sense.

[1]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Navigation and Mapping in Large Scale Space , 1988, AI Mag..

[2]  David M. Mark,et al.  Natural-Language Spatial Relations Between Linear and Areal Objects: The Topology and Metric of English-Language Terms , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Joseph O'Rourke,et al.  Computational Geometry in C. , 1995 .

[4]  Roberto Marcondes Cesar Junior,et al.  On the ternary spatial relation "Between" , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[5]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  On Fuzzy Spatial Distances , 2003 .

[6]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Fuzzy spatial relationships for image processing and interpretation: a review , 2005, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Shape Analysis and Classification: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[8]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[9]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  Qualitative Representation of Positional Information , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[10]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Degree of adjacency or surroundedness , 1984, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Distance transformations in digital images , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[14]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical morphologies: A comparative study , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Daniel Crevier,et al.  A Probabilistic Method for Extracting Chains of Collinear Segments , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[17]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  The fuzzy geometry of image subsets , 1984, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[18]  John Freeman,et al.  The modelling of spatial relations , 1975 .

[19]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[20]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Sequential Operations in Digital Picture Processing , 1966, JACM.