The use of a social network analysis technique to investigate the characteristics of crew communications in nuclear power plants - A feasibility study

Effective and reliable communications are very important in securing the safety of human-involved large process control systems because human operators have to accomplish their tasks in cooperative ways. This means that it is very important to understand the characteristics of crew communications, which can provide useful insights for preventing inappropriate communications. Unfortunately, in the nuclear industry, a systematic framework that can be used to identify the characteristics of crew communications seems to be rare. For this reason, the applicability of the social network analysis (SNA) technique to identifying the characteristics of crew communications was investigated in this study. To this end, the communication data of operating crews working in the main control room (MCR) of nuclear power plants (NPPs) were collected under two kinds of simulated off-normal conditions. Then the communication characteristics of MCR operating crews, which can be represented by the associated SNA metrics, were compared with communication characteristics that are already known from existing studies. As a result, it was found that SNA metrics could be meaningful for explaining the communication characteristics of MCR operating crews. Accordingly, it is expected that the SNA technique can be used as one of the serviceable tools to investigate the characteristics of crew communications in NPPs.

[1]  C. E. Billings,et al.  Information transfer problems in the aviation system , 1981 .

[2]  Anton Koros,et al.  Team Processes in Airway Facilities Operations Control Centers , 2000 .

[3]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[4]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[5]  Sa Kil Kim,et al.  Effectiveness of Crew Resource Management Training Program for Operators in the APR-1400 Main Control Room Simulator , 2009 .

[6]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[7]  Kunihide Sasou,et al.  Structure of operators' mental models in coping with anomalies occurring in nuclear power plants , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .

[9]  Susan J. Reinartz,et al.  Verbal communication in collective control of simulated nuclear power plant incidents , 1992 .

[10]  Kunihide Sasou,et al.  A study on the operating team activity of a nuclear power plant under abnormal operating conditions , 1993 .

[11]  C. E. Billings,et al.  The information transfer problem summary and comments , 1981 .

[12]  Kaisa Henttonen,et al.  Exploring social networks on the team level-A review of the empirical literature , 2010 .

[13]  E. Salas,et al.  Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. , 1997, Group dynamics : theory, research, and practice : the official journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association.

[14]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[15]  G Petkov,et al.  Safety investigation of team performance in accidents. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  What is special about social network analysis , 2006 .

[17]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[18]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptation to Stress in Team Decision-Making and Coordination , 1993 .

[19]  W. H. Gibson,et al.  A taxonomy of human communication errors and application to railway track maintenance , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[20]  Matthew Christian,et al.  Examining the effects of communication training and team composition on the decision making of Patriot air defense teams , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[21]  J MACY,et al.  Coding noise in a task-oriented group. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[22]  M. E. Shaw,et al.  Decision processes in communication nets. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[23]  Takashi Toriizuka,et al.  Application of performance shaping factor (PSF) for work improvement in industrial plant maintenance tasks , 2001 .

[24]  Hiroshi Ujita,et al.  An approach for evaluating expert performance in emergency situations , 1995 .

[25]  David K. Farkas,et al.  Procedure writing across domains: nuclear power plant procedures and computer documentation , 1991, SIGDOC '91.

[26]  C. Cioffi-Revilla.  Computational Analysis in US Foreign and Defense Policy , 2007 .

[27]  Daihwan Min,et al.  Observations on emergency operations using computerized procedure system , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants.

[28]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  Team structure and team performance in IS development: a social network perspective , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Effects of Workload and Structure on Team Processes and Performance: Implications for Complex Team Decision Making , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Training Effective Human Performance in the Management of Stressful Emergencies , 1999, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[31]  B. Kanki,et al.  Communication indices of crew coordination. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[32]  Hidekazu Yoshikawa.  DISTRIBUTED HMI SYSTEM FOR MANAGING ALL SPAN OF PLANT CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE , 2009 .

[33]  Johann H. Schlichter,et al.  Workspae Awareness for Distributed Teams , 1996, Coordination Technology for Collaborative Applications.

[34]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Human error data collection as a precursor to the development of a human reliability assessment capability in air traffic management , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Dirk De Bacquer,et al.  Consultation in general practice: a standard operating procedure? , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[36]  John M. O'Hara,et al.  IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF HUMAN FACTORS ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMERGING NUCLEAR PLANT TECHNOLOGY , 2009 .

[37]  Jinkyun Park.  The Complexity of Proceduralized Tasks , 2009 .

[38]  Rachael Gordon,et al.  The contribution of human factors to accidents in the offshore oil industry , 1998 .

[39]  Seunghwan Kim,et al.  Development of extended speech act coding scheme to observe communication characteristics of human operators of nuclear power plants under abnormal conditions , 2010 .

[40]  H C Foushee,et al.  Communication as group process media of aircrew performance. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[41]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[42]  H. P. Smith,et al.  A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions , 1979 .

[43]  C Bowers,et al.  Impact of automation on aircrew communication and decision-making performance. , 1995, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[44]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Identifying the team skills required by nuclear power plant operations personnel , 2008 .