Influence of Gravity Compensation on Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Temporal Phases of Arm Movements of Stroke Patients

Background. Arm support to help compensate for the effects of gravity may improve functional use of the shoulder and elbow during therapy after stroke, but gravity compensation may alter motor control. Objective. To obtain quantitative information on how gravity compensation influences muscle activation patterns during functional, 3-dimensional reaching movements. Methods. Eight patients with mild hemiparesis performed 2 sets of repeated reach and retrieval movements, with and without unloading the arm, using a device that acted at the elbow and forearm to compensate for gravity. Electromyographic (EMG) patterns of 6 upper extremity muscles were compared during elbow and shoulder joint excursions with and without gravity compensation. Results. Movement performance was similar with and without gravity compensation. Smooth rectified EMG (SRE) values were decreased from 25% to 50% during movements with gravity compensation in 5 out of 6 muscles. The variation of SRE values across movement phases did not differ across conditions. Conclusions. Gravity compensation did not affect general patterns of muscle activation in this sample of stroke patients, probably since they had adequate function to complete the task without arm support. Gravity compensation did facilitate active arm movement excursions without impairing motor control. Gravity compensation may be a valuable modality in conventional or robot-aided therapy to increase the intensity of training for mildly impaired patients.

[1]  A.H.A. Stienen,et al.  Freebal: dedicated gravity compensation for the upper extremities , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  Zhang Ying-yua.  A single-blinded multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial of ceftizoxime sodium for injection in the treatment of lower respiratory tract and urine tract infections , 2008 .

[3]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Influence of gravity compensation on muscle activity during reach and retrieval in healthy elderly. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  H. Hermens,et al.  The effect of walking aids on muscle activation patterns during walking in stroke patients. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[5]  Jacob Hilbert Buurke.  Walking after stroke co-ordination patterns & functional recovery , 2005 .

[6]  B. Maton,et al.  Electromyographic and biomechanical characteristics of segmental postural adjustments associated with voluntary wrist movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Dewald,et al.  Task-dependent weakness at the elbow in patients with hemiparesis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of stroke rehabilitation, I : a critical review of the literature , 1991 .

[10]  J. Dewald,et al.  Impact of gravity loading on post‐stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness , 2007, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Increased range of motion and decreased muscle activity during maximal reach with gravity compensation in stroke patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[12]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[13]  Michelle J Johnson,et al.  Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[15]  J. Chae,et al.  Muscle Weakness and Cocontraction in Upper Limb Hemiparesis: Relationship to Motor Impairment and Physical Disability , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Hand trajectories of vertical arm movements in one-G and zero-G environments Evidence for a central representation of gravitational force , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[18]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[20]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  W. Rymer,et al.  Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  W. Harwin,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robot-mediated stroke therapy , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.