Interrater and intrarater reliability of the wheelchair skills test version 4.2 for power wheelchair users

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study is to estimate the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) Version 4.2 for powered wheelchairs operated by adult users. Materials and methods: Cohort study with a convenience sample of occupational therapists (n = 10). For the main outcome measure, participants viewed and scored eight videos of adult power wheelchair users completing the 30 skills of the WST Version 4.2 on two occasions, a minimum of two weeks apart. Using these scores, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients to estimate interrater and intrarater reliability. Results: The interrater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.940 (95%CI 0.862–0.985). Intrarater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.923 to 0.998. Conclusions: The WST Version 4.2 has excellent interrater and intrarater reliability and is a reliable tool for use in clinical and research practice to evaluate a power wheelchair user’s skill capacity. Implications for Rehabilitation The Wheelchair Skills Test for Powered Wheelchair Users (WST-P 4.2) is a useful addition to the clinical tools available for clinicians who assess and train for powered wheelchair use. The WST-P 4.2 has excellent reliability and potential for clinical use as a pre-post measure of powered wheelchair skills. Clinicians using the WST-P 4.2 should attempt to maintain consistent scoring procedures, particularly for those skills that may require subjective assessment of skill safety.

[1]  François Routhier,et al.  Efficacy and retention of the French-Canadian version of the wheelchair skills training program for manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Paula W Rushton,et al.  Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test – Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users* , 2016, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[3]  Deirdre R. Dawson,et al.  Development of the Power-Mobility Indoor Driving Assessment for Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Report , 1994 .

[4]  C. Hass,et al.  Effect of Moderate-Intensity Exercise Training on the Cognitive Function of Young Adults with Intellectual Disabilities , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[5]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Are wheelchair-skills assessment and training relevant for long-standing wheelchair users? Two case reports , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[7]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  E. Andresen,et al.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Krista L Best,et al.  The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Ingvor Pettersson,et al.  The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[11]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  Effectiveness of a Wheelchair Skills Training Program for Powered Wheelchair Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Kara Edwards,et al.  A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[13]  W. Miller,et al.  Perceptions of Power Mobility Use and Safety within Residential Facilities , 2005, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[14]  Ryan Fomiatti,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Powered Mobility Devices on Older Adults’ Activity Engagement , 2013 .

[15]  Claudine Auger,et al.  Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Mark Schmeler,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability and Cross Validation of the Functioning Everyday With a Wheelchair Instrument , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[17]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[18]  Louise Demers,et al.  Power wheelchair driving challenges in the community: a users’ perspective , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[19]  Environmental Factors and Their Role in Community Integration after Spinal Cord Injury , 2007, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[21]  Krista L Best,et al.  Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  W Ben Mortenson,et al.  Prevalence of Wheelchair and Scooter Use Among Community-Dwelling Canadians , 2016, Physical Therapy.

[23]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[25]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Health and Ageing A Discussion Paper , 2022 .