The life cycle of scholars and papers in economics – the ‘citation death tax’

The information content of academic citations is a subject to debate. This article views premature death as a tragic ‘natural experiment’, outlining a methodology identifying the ‘citation death tax’ – the impact of the death of productive economists on the patterns of their citations. We rely on a sample of 428 papers written by 16 well-known economists who died well before retirement, during the period 1975 to 1997. The news is mixed: for half of the sample, we identify a large and significant ‘citation death tax’ for the average paper written by these scholars. For these authors, the estimated average missing citations per paper attributed to premature death ranges from 40% to 140% (the overall average is about 90%), and the annual costs of lost citations per paper are in the range 3–14%. Hence, a paper written 10 years before the author's death avoids a citation cost that varies between 30% and 140%. For the other half of the sample, there is no citation death tax; and for two Nobel Prize-calibre scholars in this second group, Black and Tversky, citations took off over time, reflecting the growing recognitions of their seminal works.

[1]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Scholarships, Citations and Salaries: Economic Rewards in Economics , 1982 .

[2]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[3]  David N. Laband,et al.  Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  J. Ravetz Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[5]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  A. Diamond,et al.  What is a Citation Worth ? , 2001 .

[7]  R. Blank The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review , 1991 .

[8]  J. McDowell,et al.  Obsolescence of Knowledge and Career Publication Profiles: Some Evidence of Differences among Fields in Costs of Interrupted Careers , 1982 .

[9]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  Intellectual Collaboration , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Per Ottar Seglen,et al.  The skewness of science , 1992 .

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[12]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[13]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Oscar Volij,et al.  The Measurement of Intellectual Influence , 2002 .

[15]  Arthur M. Diamond The money value of citations to single-authored and multiple-authored articles , 2005, Scientometrics.

[16]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[17]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  An Economic Analysis of the Use of Citations in the Law , 2000 .

[18]  G Taubes,et al.  Measure for measure in science. , 1993, Science.

[19]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[20]  M. Ferber,et al.  CITATIONS AND NETWORKING , 1988 .

[21]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Does self-citation pay? , 2007, Scientometrics.