Potential Pathways to the German Bioeconomy: A Media Discourse Analysis of Public Perceptions

The bioeconomy has emerged as a popular, but ambiguous vision for a sustainable future. Its implementation depends not only on novel products and production processes, but also on balancing diverse interests, values, and interpretations of the concept. The German government’s plan to develop a sustainable bioeconomy in response to structural change in the lignite mining regions provides a unique opportunity to investigate what pathways towards the bioeconomy are supported by society. In order to characterize bioeconomy visions prevalent in public perception, we conducted a computer-assisted, mixed-methods discourse analysis of German-language newspaper articles published between 2010 and 2019. Results show that a techno-economic vision is dominant over ecological and social aspects, suggesting only one clear pathway to the German bioeconomy, which is increasingly criticized in the public debate.

[1]  Alexandru Giurca.  Unpacking the network discourse: Actors and storylines in Germany's wood-based bioeconomy , 2020 .

[2]  Sina Leipold,et al.  Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives , 2019, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning.

[3]  P. Schwarzbauer,et al.  Depicting the peril and not the potential of forests for a biobased economy? A qualitative content analysis on online news media coverage in German language articles , 2019, Forest Policy and Economics.

[4]  Rolf Meyer,et al.  One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy , 2019, Sustainability.

[5]  V. Varho,et al.  Not so sustainable? Images of bioeconomy by future environmental professionals and citizens , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Stefan Rädiker,et al.  Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA , 2019 .

[7]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Auf der Suche nach dem heiligen Gral , 2019, Revolution im Profifußball.

[8]  Juha Peltomaa.  Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media , 2018, Sustainability.

[9]  T. Stern,et al.  Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study , 2018, Sustainability.

[10]  Stefanie Bröring,et al.  Collective stakeholder representations and perceptions of drivers of novel biomass-based value chains , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  K. Zander,et al.  Societal Perspectives on a Bio-economy in Germany: An Explorative Study Using Q Methodology , 2018 .

[12]  Helga Pülzl,et al.  Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? , 2018 .

[13]  Alexandru Giurca,et al.  Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses , 2017 .

[14]  F. Mukhtarov,et al.  Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy? , 2017 .

[15]  C. Lauk,et al.  A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices , 2017 .

[16]  O. Frör,et al.  Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy , 2017 .

[17]  K. Birch.  Emergent Imaginaries and Fragmented Policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-Economy , 2016 .

[18]  Wiebke Lass,et al.  Against the wind: Local opposition to the German Energiewende , 2016 .

[19]  Markus M. Bugge,et al.  What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature , 2016 .

[20]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Entropy Law And The Economic Process , 2016 .

[21]  Karin Rothschild,et al.  Discourse Analysis An Introduction , 2016 .

[22]  H. Grethe,et al.  The Public Debate on Biofuels in Germany: Who Drives the Discourse? , 2015 .

[23]  J. Maxwell,et al.  Notes toward a Theory of Qualitative Data Analysis , 2014 .

[24]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Using software in qualitative analysis , 2013 .

[25]  K. McCormick,et al.  Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches , 2013 .

[26]  Kes McCormick,et al.  The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview , 2013 .

[27]  Britta Hilt,et al.  Energiewende?! , 2012, Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management.

[28]  Michael Oborne,et al.  The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda , 2010 .

[29]  M. Hajer,et al.  A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives , 2005 .

[30]  J. Cobb,et al.  The green national product: a proposed index of sustainable economic welfare , 1994 .

[31]  N. Georgescu-Roegen.  The Entropy Law and the Economic Process , 1973 .