Which Post Will Impress the Most?: Impression Formation Based on Visual and Textual Cues in Facebook Profiles

The existing research presents ambivalent evidence regarding the significance of visual cues, as opposed to textual cues, in the process of impression formation. While textual information might poses a stronger effect due to its solid and unambiguous character, visual information may have a stronger effect due to its vividness and immediate absorption. This debate is particularly relevant in the context of online social networks, as they are constructed on the sharing of textual and visual elements between their users. Two consecutive online studies test the main research question: Which elements of one's Facebook profile have a more significant influence on impression formation- pictures or texts? Study 1 found that outside the context of Facebook, textual cues were more dominant in the process of impression formation. Study 2, which tested impression formation via Facebook, further corroborated this result; suggesting that the textual cues are also dominant in the context of online profiles. Moreover, these effects were influenced by individual characteristics of the participants, such as 'need for cognition', in a manner that individuals with a high need for cognition placed more emphasis on textual cues. Amount of 'likes' also influenced the impression formation, especially when the profile owner was perceived as manipulative. Additional interactions and further implication are discussed.

[1]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of Facebook profile photographs , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Olli Pitkänen,et al.  Users' Awareness of Privacy on Online Social Networking Sites - Case Facebook , 2009, Bled eConference.

[3]  Steffen Dalsgaard,et al.  Tales from Facebook , 2012 .

[4]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Transportation Across Media: Repeated Exposure to Print and Film , 2008 .

[5]  Michael A. Stefanone,et al.  Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[7]  D. Mattison.  The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age , 1997 .

[8]  P. Costa,et al.  A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory , 2004 .

[9]  Carlos Flavián Blanco,et al.  Effects of visual and textual information in online product presentations: looking for the best combination in website design , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Erin M. Schumaker,et al.  The Effects of Verbal Versus Photographic Self‐Presentation on Impression Formation in Facebook , 2012 .

[11]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[12]  Lindsay T. Graham,et al.  A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[13]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Erika Pearson,et al.  Making a Good (Virtual) First Impression: The Use of Visuals in Online Impression Management and Creating Identity Performances , 2010, HCC.

[16]  M. Bar,et al.  Very first impressions. , 2006, Emotion.

[17]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures Under Directed Processing Versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising , 2003 .

[18]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Why Do People Use Facebook? , 2012, Personality and individual differences.

[19]  R. Riggio,et al.  Impression formation: the role of expressive behavior. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Marina Milyavskaya,et al.  Seeking Social Connectedness: Interdependent Self-Construal and Impression Formation Using Photographic Cues of Social Connectedness , 2010, The Journal of social psychology.

[21]  D. T. Kao.  Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion. , 2011, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[22]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating , 2011, Commun. Res..

[23]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[24]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues. , 1978 .

[25]  Nurit Tal-Or.  Direct and indirect self-promotion in the eyes of the perceivers , 2010 .

[26]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[27]  Quoc C. Vuong,et al.  First impressions: Gait cues drive reliable trait judgements , 2012, Cognition.

[28]  Michael J. Sherrard,et al.  The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on web-site evaluations : a resource-matching perspective , 2005 .

[29]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[30]  Nurit Tal-Or,et al.  Bragging in the right context: Impressions formed of self-promoters who create a context for their boasts , 2010 .

[31]  Brandon Lee,et al.  Persuasion on the 'Net: A Synthetic Propositional Framework , 2008 .

[32]  R. Petty,et al.  21. The need for cognition , 2009 .

[33]  J. Walther.  Impression Development in Computer-Mediated Interaction. , 1993 .

[34]  R. Vonk,et al.  Impression Formation and Impression Management: Motives, Traits, and Likeability Inferred from Self-Promoting and Self-Deprecating Behavior , 1999 .

[35]  R. Wyer,et al.  The impact of pictures on narrative- and list-based impression formation: A process interference model , 2007 .

[36]  Erin E. Hollenbaugh,et al.  Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[38]  M. Leary,et al.  Handbook of individual differences in social behavior , 2009 .

[39]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[40]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Jeffrey A. Hall,et al.  Impression management and formation on Facebook: A lens model approach , 2014, New Media Soc..

[43]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..