Sensorimotor nucleus NIf is necessary for auditory processing but not vocal motor output in the avian song system.

Sensorimotor integration in the avian song system is crucial for both learning and maintenance of song, a vocal motor behavior. Although a number of song system areas demonstrate both sensory and motor characteristics, their exact roles in auditory and premotor processing are unclear. In particular, it is unknown whether input from the forebrain nucleus interface of the nidopallium (NIf), which exhibits both sensory and premotor activity, is necessary for both auditory and premotor processing in its target, HVC. Here we show that bilateral NIf lesions result in long-term loss of HVC auditory activity but do not impair song production. NIf is thus a major source of auditory input to HVC, but an intact NIf is not necessary for motor output in adult zebra finches.

[1]  M. Konishi The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. , 1965, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[2]  K. Immelmann Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches , 1969 .

[3]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus– field L–in the canary , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  Philip H. Price Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. , 1979 .

[6]  J. S. McCasland,et al.  Neuronal control of bird song production , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Nordeen,et al.  Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[10]  H. Williams,et al.  Temporal patterning of song production: participation of nucleus uvaeformis of the thalamus. , 1993, Journal of neurobiology.

[11]  J. Wild,et al.  Visual and somatosensory inputs to the avian song system via nucleus uvaeformis (Uva) and a comparison with the projections of a similar thalamic nucleus in a nonsongbird, columbia livia , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  D. Margoliash,et al.  Parallel pathways and convergence onto HVc and adjacent neostriatum of adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  A. C. Yu,et al.  Temporal Hierarchical Control of Singing in Birds , 1996, Science.

[14]  Sarah M. N. Woolley,et al.  Bengalese Finches Lonchura Striata Domestica Depend upon Auditory Feedback for the Maintenance of Adult Song , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  K Okanoya,et al.  Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[16]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  Reafferent thalamo‐“cortical” loops in the song system of oscine songbirds , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback , 1999, Nature.

[18]  D Margoliash,et al.  Gradual Emergence of Song Selectivity in Sensorimotor Structures of the Male Zebra Finch Song System , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Lesion of a higher‐order song nucleus disrupts phrase level complexity in Bengalese finches , 2000, Neuroreport.

[20]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Age at Deafening Affects the Stability of Learned Song in Adult Male Zebra Finches , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Michael S. Brainard,et al.  Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  C. E. Ho,et al.  A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Afferent Input Is Necessary for Seasonal Growth and Maintenance of Adult Avian Song Control Circuits , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M S Brainard,et al.  Postlearning Consolidation of Birdsong: Stabilizing Effects of Age and Anterior Forebrain Lesions , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[26]  The Long-Term Resetting of a Brainstem Pacemaker Nucleus by Synaptic Input: A Model for Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  K. D. Punta,et al.  An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird , 2002 .

[28]  Towards quantification of vocal imitation in the zebra finch , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  Shiva R. Sinha,et al.  Neurobiology of echolocation in bats , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Song system auditory responses are stable and highly tuned during sedation, rapidly modulated and unselective during wakefulness, and suppressed by arousal. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Marc F. Schmidt,et al.  Pattern of interhemispheric synchronization in HVc during singing correlates with key transitions in the song pattern. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Auditory responses in multiple sensorimotor song system nuclei are co-modulated by behavioral state. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  R. Mooney,et al.  Synaptic Transformations Underlying Highly Selective Auditory Representations of Learned Birdsong , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.