Independent Distractor Frequency and Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Picture–Word Interference: fMRI Evidence for Post-lexical and Lexical Accounts according to Distractor Type

In two fMRI experiments, participants named pictures with superimposed distractors that were high or low in frequency or varied in terms of age of acquisition. Pictures superimposed with low-frequency words were named more slowly than those superimposed with high-frequency words, and late-acquired words interfered with picture naming to a greater extent than early-acquired words. The distractor frequency effect (Experiment 1) was associated with increased activity in left premotor and posterior superior temporal cortices, consistent with the operation of an articulatory response buffer and verbal self-monitoring system. Conversely, the distractor age-of-acquisition effect (Experiment 2) was associated with increased activity in the left middle and posterior middle temporal cortex, consistent with the operation of lexical level processes such as lemma and phonological word form retrieval. The spatially dissociated patterns of activity across the two experiments indicate that distractor effects in picture–word interference may occur at lexical or postlexical levels of processing in speech production.

[1]  Arturo E. Hernandez,et al.  Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: the frequency-lag hypothesis. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  W. Heij,et al.  Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[6]  G. Altmann,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2007 .

[7]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. , 1995 .

[8]  Kevin G. Munhall,et al.  Functional Overlap between Regions Involved in Speech Perception and in Monitoring One's Own Voice during Speech Production , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[10]  B. Shaywitz,et al.  Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia , 2008, Development and Psychopathology.

[11]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  On the selection of words and oral motor responses: Evidence of a response-independent fronto-parietal network , 2010, Cortex.

[13]  Frank Oppermann,et al.  Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? , 2006 .

[16]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions , 2011 .

[17]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[18]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  P. Bonin,et al.  Norms and comprehension times for 305 French idiomatic expressions , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Cristina Burani,et al.  What causes the effect of age of acquisition in lexical processing? , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Stéphanie Riès,et al.  General-Purpose Monitoring during Speech Production , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Theory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling , 2005 .

[25]  K. Mcmahon,et al.  Improving EPI imaging quality and sound levels with bandwidth selection , 2004 .

[26]  Mart Bles,et al.  Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[27]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Mix, a program for pseudorandomization , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and Picture–Word Interference , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Francois-Xavier Alario,et al.  Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network , 2009, NeuroImage.

[31]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and the Locus of Repetition Priming of Picture Naming , 2001 .

[34]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high‐field NMR , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  G I de Zubicaray,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture‐word paradigm: An event‐related fMRI study employing overt responses , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of functional activation in Broca's area during overt picture naming , 2009, Cortex.

[37]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[38]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Semantic interference in object naming: An fMRI study of the postcue naming paradigm , 2010, NeuroImage.

[42]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .

[44]  L. Cohen,et al.  The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production , 2006, Brain Research.

[45]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Orthographic/Phonological Facilitation of Naming Responses in the Picture–Word Task: An Event-Related fMRI Study Using Overt Vocal Responding , 2002, NeuroImage.

[46]  E. Formisano,et al.  Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[47]  A. W. Ellis,et al.  Traces of vocabulary acquisition in the brain: Evidence from covert object naming , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[49]  Chang H. Lee,et al.  PHONOLOGICAL RECODING OF MIXED-CASE WORDS IN THE PRIMING TASK , 2002 .

[50]  Albert Costa,et al.  The effect of word-frequency on lexical selection in speech production: Evidence from semantic homogeneous naming contexts , 2006 .

[51]  C. Price The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Speech Errors and Language Production: Neuropsychological and Connectionist Perspectives. , 2003 .

[53]  Katie McMahon,et al.  Top‐down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[54]  Jonathan C Catling,et al.  The varying effects of age of acquisition , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[56]  K I Forster,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[57]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis , 2005, Cognition.

[58]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[59]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[60]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  Imaging speech production using fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[62]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Multiple perspectives on word production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[63]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[64]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Neural Systems underlying Lexical Competition: An Eye Tracking and fMRI Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Kevin Dent,et al.  Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: a dual-task investigation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010). , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attention to Spoken Word Planning: Chronometric and Neuroimaging Evidence , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[68]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[69]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[70]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production , 2009, NeuroImage.

[71]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[72]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Applications , 2002, NeuroImage.

[73]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[74]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  A Common Neural Substrate for Language Production and Verbal Working Memory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[76]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[77]  D. Bub,et al.  Interference from related items in object identification. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[78]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. , 1975 .

[79]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series , 2004, NeuroImage.

[80]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[81]  Piers L. Cornelissen,et al.  Interactions between visual and semantic processing during object recognition revealed by modulatory effects of age of acquisition , 2014, NeuroImage.