Diversity and density: Lexically determined evaluative and informational consequences of linguistic complexity

Lexical diversity and lexical density are discussed in terms of the construct “stimulus complexity.” Competing predictions are offered regarding the effects of diversity (high vs. moderate vs. low) and density (high vs. low) on listeners’ evaluative judgments and retention of factual information.

[1]  E. Walker COMPLEXITY AND PREFERENCE IN ANIMALS AND MEN * , 1970 .

[2]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE OF PERCEIVED HOMOPHILY IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[3]  Charles L. Houck,et al.  Dialect and Identification in Persuasive Messages , 1969, Language and speech.

[4]  H. Day,et al.  The importance of symmetry and complexity in the evaluation of complexity, interest and pleasingness , 1968 .

[5]  Lawrence R. Wheeless The effects of attitude, credibility, and homophily on selective exposure to information , 1974 .

[6]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Novelty, arousal, and the reinforcement of diversive exploration in the rat. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  C. W. Carmichael,et al.  Frustration and language intensity , 1965 .

[8]  E. Walker,et al.  Psychological complexity and preference : a hedgehog theory of behavior , 1973 .

[9]  S. Becker Interest, tension, and retentiona1 , 1964 .

[10]  L. A. McArthur The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. , 1972 .

[11]  J. Bradac,et al.  Verbal behavior of interviewees: the effects of several situational variables on verbal productivity, disfluency, and lexical diversity. , 1976, Journal of communication disorders.

[12]  James J. Bradac,et al.  Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness , 1976 .

[13]  John Lyons,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics , 1971 .

[14]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Effects of complexity and prechoice stimulation on exploratory choice , 1971 .

[15]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar , 1976 .

[16]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[17]  W. E. Dawson,et al.  Scaling of apparent accentedness by magnitude estimation and sensory modality matching , 1975, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  Robert S. Wachal,et al.  Some Measures of Lexical Diversity in Aphasic and Normal Language Performance , 1973, Language and speech.

[19]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[20]  H. Simons,et al.  Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory. , 1970 .

[21]  D. Whitney,et al.  Analyzing Questionnaire Results: Multiple Tests of Hypothese and Multivariate Hypotheses , 1973 .

[22]  Richard J. Harris A primer of multivariate statistics , 1975 .

[23]  W. Lambert A Social Psychology of Bilingualism , 1967 .

[24]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[25]  Greg W. Schmidt,et al.  The effects of perceived status and linguistic diversity upon judgment of speaker attributes and message effectiveness. , 1976, The Journal of psychology.

[26]  M Höweler,et al.  Diversity of word usage as a stress indicator in an interview situation , 1972, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  F. Crick,et al.  Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid , 1953, Nature.

[28]  C. Perfetti Lexical density and phrase structure depth as variables in sentence retention , 1969 .

[29]  D. Berlyne CHAPTER 1 – The Vicissitudes of Aplopathematic and Thelematoscopic Pneumatology (or The Hydrography of Hedonism)1 , 1973 .

[30]  L. T. Brown,et al.  Some physical determinants of viewing time under three instructional sets , 1966 .

[31]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Language Within Language: Immediacy, a Channel in Verbal Communication , 1968 .

[32]  J. Burgoon CONFLICTING INFORMATION, ATTITUDE, AND MESSAGE VARIABLES AS PREDICTORS OF LEARNING AND PERSUASION1 , 1975 .