Phase II trial of gemcitabine/irinotecan in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND Gemcitabine and irinotecan have shown a broad range of activity in solid tumors, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a synergistic effect on SCLC cell lines. The objective of this phase II trial was to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine/irinotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients (15 with refractory disease and 20 with sensitive disease) who had experienced treatment failure with 1 previous chemotherapy regimen were recruited. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. Eligibility criteria included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and signed informed consent. RESULTS All 35 patients were assessable for response, survival, and toxicity. Best objective responses exhibited were as follows: complete response in 2 patients (6%), partial response in 4 (11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-61%), stable disease in 7 (20%; 95% CI, 9%-45%), and progressive disease in 22 (63%; 95% CI, 17%-57%). Median time to disease progression was 3.4 months and median survival was 5.8 months. The 1-year survival rate was 34%. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 9% of patients, neuropathy occurred in 2.8%, and diarrhea occurred in 14.3%. Survival was not significantly different for patients with refractory versus sensitive disease. CONCLUSION The combination of gemcitabine/irinotecan was shown to be active as second-line chemotherapy, especially in patients with refractory disease.

[1]  Kesava Reddy Evolving role of topotecan in treating small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, Clinical lung cancer.

[2]  Sylvia S. Richey,et al.  The impact of dose per cycle of etoposide and cisplatin on outcomes in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, Clinical lung cancer.

[3]  I. Smith,et al.  First-line chemotherapy rechallenge after relapse in small cell lung cancer , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[4]  C. Blanke,et al.  Phase II trial of gemcitabine in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 1597. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  K. Mori,et al.  Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  W. Schuette Chemotherapy as treatment of primary and recurrent small cell lung cancer. , 2001, Lung cancer.

[7]  M. Fisher,et al.  Irinotecan and cisplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin in small-cell lung cancer: JCOG 9511. , 2000, Clinical lung cancer.

[8]  A. Safa,et al.  Synergistic effect of gemcitabine and irinotecan (CPT-11) on breast and small cell lung cancer cell lines. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[9]  A. Safa,et al.  Single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine/irinotecan combination (irimogem) in non-small cell lung cancer. , 1999, Seminars in oncology.

[10]  J. Carmichael,et al.  Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. Glick,et al.  Phase II study of topotecan in patients with extensive-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Gemcitabine is an active new agent in previously untreated extensive small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  J. Crawford,et al.  Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Prolonged administration of oral etoposide in patients with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  P. Fayers,et al.  Survival, adverse reactions and quality of life during combination chemotherapy compared with selective palliative treatment for small-cell lung cancer. Report to the Medical Research Council by its Lung Cancer Working Party. , 1989, Respiratory medicine.

[16]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Reinduction chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[17]  R. Feld,et al.  Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in etoposide- and cisplatin-resistant small cell lung cancer. , 1987, Cancer treatment reports.

[18]  T R Fleming,et al.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. , 1982, Biometrics.