Interplays between pre- and post-natal environments affect early-life mortality, body mass and telomere dynamics in the wild

ABSTRACT Early-life conditions are crucial determinants of phenotype and fitness. The effects of pre- and post-natal conditions on fitness prospects have been widely studied but their interactive effects have received less attention. In birds, asynchronous hatching creates challenging developmental conditions for the last-hatched chicks, but differential allocation in last-laid eggs might help to compensate this initial handicap. The relative importance and potential interaction between pre- and post-hatching developmental conditions for different fitness components remains mostly unknown. We manipulated hatching order in wild pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), creating three groups: natural asynchrony (last-laid eggs hatching last), reversed asynchrony (last-laid eggs hatching first) and hatching synchrony (all eggs hatching at once). We examined the effects of these manipulations on early-life survival, growth and telomere length, a potential cellular biomarker of fitness prospects. Mortality was mostly affected by hatching order, with last-hatched chicks being more likely to die. Early-life telomere dynamics and growth were influenced by the interplays between laying and hatching order. Last-laid but first-hatched chicks were heavier but had shorter telomeres 5 days after hatching than their siblings, indicating rapid early growth with potential adverse consequences on telomere length. Synchronous chicks did not suffer any apparent cost of hatching synchronously. Impaired phenotypes only occurred when reversing the natural hatching order (i.e. developmental mismatch), suggesting that maternal investment in last-laid eggs might indeed counterbalance the initial handicap of last-hatched chicks. Our experimental study thus highlights that potential interplays between pre- and post-natal environments are likely to shape fitness prospects in the wild. Summary: Hatching order manipulation in a wild bird reveals interacting effects of pre- and post-natal developing conditions on early-life phenotype and potential future performance.

[1]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Pace and stability of embryonic development affect telomere dynamics: an experimental study in a precocial bird model , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[2]  A. Velando,et al.  Gull chicks grow faster but lose telomeres when prenatal cues mismatch the real presence of sibling competitors , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[3]  T. Groothuis,et al.  Manipulation of Prenatal Thyroid Hormones Does Not Affect Growth or Physiology in Nestling Pied Flycatchers , 2020, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[4]  P. Bize,et al.  Correlation in telomere lengths between feathers and blood cells in pied flycatchers , 2020 .

[5]  S. Drobniak,et al.  The association between stressors and telomeres in non-human vertebrates: a meta-analysis. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[6]  S. Helle,et al.  Impact of continuous predator threat on telomere dynamics in parent and nestling pied flycatchers , 2019, Oecologia.

[7]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Is telomere length a molecular marker of individual quality? Insights from a long-lived bird , 2019, Functional Ecology.

[8]  P. Gluckman,et al.  Evolutionary and developmental mismatches are consequences of adaptive developmental plasticity in humans and have implications for later disease risk , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[9]  P. Becker,et al.  Maternal investment in last-laid eggs does not compensate for hatching asynchrony in a seabird , 2019, Oecologia.

[10]  M. Hall,et al.  Early‐life telomere length predicts lifespan and lifetime reproductive success in a wild bird , 2019, Molecular ecology.

[11]  Martin N. Andersson,et al.  Female variation in allocation of steroid hormones, antioxidants and fatty acids: a multilevel analysis in a wild passerine bird , 2018, bioRxiv.

[12]  S. Ozanne,et al.  Somatic growth and telomere dynamics in vertebrates: relationships, mechanisms and consequences , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  C. Walling,et al.  The relationship between telomere length and mortality risk in non-model vertebrate systems: a meta-analysis , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  C. Both,et al.  Shifts in hatch dates do not provide pied flycatchers with a rapid ontogenetic route to adjust offspring time schedules to climate change , 2017 .

[15]  R. Thomson,et al.  Maternal transfer of androgens in eggs is affected by food supplementation but not by predation risk , 2016 .

[16]  M. Tissier,et al.  Starting with a handicap: effects of asynchronous hatching on growth rate, oxidative stress and telomere dynamics in free-living great tits , 2015, Oecologia.

[17]  A. Chiaradia,et al.  Older female little penguins Eudyptula minor adjust nutrient allocations to both eggs , 2015 .

[18]  S. Helle,et al.  Natural selection for earlier male arrival to breeding grounds through direct and indirect effects in a migratory songbird , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[19]  Pat Monaghan,et al.  An experimental demonstration that early-life competitive disadvantage accelerates telomere loss , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  E. Danchin,et al.  Is natural hatching asynchrony optimal? An experimental investigation of sibling competition patterns in a facultatively siblicidal seabird , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  A. Aviv,et al.  Do leukocyte telomere length dynamics depend on baseline telomere length? An analysis that corrects for ‘regression to the mean’ , 2013, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[22]  Manuel Serrano,et al.  The Hallmarks of Aging , 2013, Cell.

[23]  Martina Muller,et al.  Within-Clutch Variation in Yolk Testosterone as an Adaptive Maternal Effect to Modulate Avian Sibling Competition: Evidence from a Comparative Study , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[24]  D. Lucy,et al.  Parentally biased favouritism in relation to offspring sex in zebra finches , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  V. Tilgar,et al.  Antioxidant protection, immune function and growth of nestling great tits Parus major in relation to within-brood hierarchy. , 2010, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[26]  C. Krebs,et al.  The ghosts of predators past: population cycles and the role of maternal programming under fluctuating predation risk. , 2010, Ecology.

[27]  A. Moorman,et al.  Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  M. Weinstock The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[29]  Philip H. Ramsey,et al.  Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[30]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Hatching asynchrony and early nestling mortality: the feeding constraint hypothesis , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  G. Hegyi,et al.  Carotenoids in the egg yolks of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) in relation to parental quality, environmental factors and laying order , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  J. Prechl,et al.  Maternal immunoglobulin concentration in Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) eggs in relation to parental quality and laying order , 2006 .

[33]  T. Groothuis,et al.  Maternal hormones as a tool to adjust offspring phenotype in avian species , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[34]  T. Laaksonen Hatching asynchrony as a bet-hedging strategy – an offspring diversity hypothesis , 2004 .

[35]  T. Amundsen,et al.  Food limitation in asynchronous bluethroat broods: effects on food distribution, nestling begging, and parental provisioning rules , 2003 .

[36]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  J. Lindström,et al.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Chick Begging Strategies in Relation to Brood Hierarchies and Hatching Asynchrony , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[40]  S. Aljanabi,et al.  Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  M. Cucco,et al.  Sibling competition in asynchronously hatched broods of the Pallid Swift (Apus pallidus) , 1994 .

[42]  R. Magrath HATCHING ASYNCHRONY IN ALTRICIAL BIRDS , 1990 .

[43]  Karin Gottlander,et al.  Parental Feeding Behaviour and Sibling Competition in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca , 1987 .

[44]  T. Slagsvold Asynchronous Versus Synchronous Hatching in Birds: Experiments with the Pied Flycatcher , 1986 .

[45]  S. A. Barnett,et al.  The natural regulation of animal numbers , 1955 .

[46]  M. Schaub,et al.  The effects of hatching asynchrony on growth and mortality patterns in Eurasian Hoopoe Upupa epops nestlings , 2018 .

[47]  C. Both,et al.  Light‐level geolocators reveal migratory connectivity in European populations of pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca , 2016 .

[48]  A. Pinto,et al.  Telomere protein complexes and interactions with telomerase in telomere maintenance. , 2011, Frontiers in bioscience.

[49]  D. Gil Chapter 7 Hormones in Avian Eggs: Physiology, Ecology and Behavior , 2008 .

[50]  F. Trillmich,et al.  Parent–offspring and sibling conflict in Galápagos fur seals and sea lions , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  S. Forbes,et al.  Begging and Asymmetric Nestling Competition , 2002 .