Dental Impression Materials and Techniques.

Dental impression making is the process of creating a negative form of the teeth and oral tissues, into which gypsum or other die materials can be processed to create working analogues. Contemporary dentistry generates new information every year and digital dentistry is becoming established and influential. Although dentists should stay abreast of new technologies, some of the conventional materials and time-tested techniques remain widely used. It is important to review the impression-making process to ensure that practitioners have up-to-date information about how to safely and effectively capture the exact form of the oral tissues to provide optimal patient management.

[1]  G. Soh,et al.  Effect of operator variability on void formation in impressions made with an automixed addition silicone. , 1992, Australian dental journal.

[2]  Bernd Wöstmann,et al.  Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. , 2009, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[3]  T. Attin,et al.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  Alan B. Carr,et al.  McCracken's Removable partial prosthodontics , 1973 .

[5]  Dennis J Fasbinder,et al.  Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. , 2010, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[6]  Kyoung-Nam Kim,et al.  The by u hyd , 2014 .

[7]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  The effect of chlorine-based disinfectant on wettability of a vinyl polysiloxane impression material. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  Khaled Q. Al Hamad,et al.  A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  Clair D. Reitz,et al.  The setting of vinyl polysiloxane and condensation silicone putties when mixed with gloved hands. , 1988, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  B. Laufer,et al.  The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  U. Brägger,et al.  Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  C. Sammut,et al.  Effectiveness of Disinfectants on Antimicrobial and Physical Properties of Dental Impression Materials. , 2016, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[13]  M. Waters,et al.  The effect of disinfection and a wetting agent on the wettability of addition-polymerized silicone impression materials. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[14]  Konstantinos Chochlidakis,et al.  Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  Klaus Radermacher,et al.  Soft tissue-preserving computer-aided impression: a novel concept using ultrasonic 3D-scanning. , 2014, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[16]  Jeffery B. Price,et al.  Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology , 2015 .

[17]  C. Goodacre,et al.  Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. , 2014, Dental clinics of North America.

[18]  Perng-Ru Liu,et al.  A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[19]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  Current concepts in gingival displacement. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[20]  K. Boening,et al.  Clinical significance of surface activation of silicone impression materials. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  H. Darby,et al.  Copper-band gingival retraction to produce void-free crown and bridge impressions. , 1973, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  M. Cune,et al.  Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[23]  Wael Att,et al.  The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. , 2014, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[24]  John C. Wataha Dmd,et al.  Dental Materials: Foundations and Applications , 2015 .

[25]  M. Wevers,et al.  The influence of mixing methods and disinfectant on the physical properties of alginate impression materials. , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[26]  Chung‐Han Ho,et al.  Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  T. D. Larson,et al.  The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[28]  D. Çakır,et al.  Evaluation of outgassing, tear strength, and detail reproduction in alginate substitute materials. , 2012, Operative dentistry.

[29]  M. Schmitter,et al.  Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  C. Petrie,et al.  Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection. , 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[31]  Emad W. Estafanous,et al.  Disinfection of bacterially contaminated hydrophilic PVS impression materials. , 2012, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[32]  J. R. Blankenship,et al.  Effects of electrosurgery on the gingival attachment in rhesus monkeys. , 1976, Journal of periodontology.

[33]  Takashi Miyazaki,et al.  A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. , 2009, Dental materials journal.

[34]  Jennifer R. Melander,et al.  Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness. , 2013, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[35]  K. Inoue,et al.  Effect of mixing method on rheological properties of alginate impression materials. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[36]  T. Schulein Significant events in the history of operative dentistry. , 2005, Journal of the history of dentistry.

[37]  S. Thongthammachat,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. , 2002, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[38]  T. Salinas Treatment of edentulism: optimizing outcomes with tissue management and impression techniques. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[39]  R. G. Tupac,et al.  A comparison of cord gingival displacement with the gingitage technique. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[40]  Techkouhie A Hamalian,et al.  Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[41]  P. Spencer,et al.  Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[42]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[43]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Effects of chlorine‐based and quaternary ammonium‐based disinfectants on the wettability of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[44]  E. Kotsiomiti,et al.  Accuracy and stability of impression materials subjected to chemical disinfection - a literature review. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[45]  J. R. Cox A clinical study comparing marginal and occlusal accuracy of crowns fabricated from double-arch and complete-arch impressions. , 2005, Australian dental journal.

[46]  Flocken Je Electrosurgical management of soft tissues and restorative dentistry. , 1980 .

[47]  H S Cardash,et al.  The linear accuracy of impressions and stone dies as affected by the thickness of the impression margin. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[48]  F. Demarco,et al.  A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement. , 2014, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[49]  Techkouhie A. Hamalian DChD,et al.  Impression Materials in Fixed Prosthodontics: Influence of Choice on Clinical Procedure , 2011 .

[50]  Norbert Enkling Dr. med. dent.,et al.  Vinylsiloxanether: A New Impression Material. Clinical Study of Implant Impressions with Vinylsiloxanether versus Polyether Materials , 2009 .

[51]  Erdem Ozdemir,et al.  A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[52]  T. Attin,et al.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[53]  Panos Papaspyridakos,et al.  Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[54]  Keith M Phillips,et al.  A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[55]  J. Carey,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring. , 2012, Journal.

[56]  G. H. Johnson,et al.  Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[57]  G. Kaplowitz Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[58]  R. Mericske-Stern,et al.  Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[59]  Seok-Hwan Cho,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[60]  John M. Powers,et al.  Craig's Restorative Dental Materials , 2012 .

[61]  G. H. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[62]  B. Benson,et al.  Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[63]  Sang J. Lee,et al.  An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[64]  R. Brandt,et al.  A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[65]  Martin F. Land,et al.  Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics , 1988 .

[66]  T. Donovan,et al.  Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[67]  Barry S Rubel Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[68]  Jui-che Tsai,et al.  Dental Optical Coherence Tomography , 2013, Sensors.

[69]  G. Soh,et al.  Relationship of viscosity to porosities in automixed elastomeric impressions. , 1991, Clinical materials.

[70]  J. Aarts,et al.  Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[71]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Effect of disinfection on the dimensional stability of polyether impression materials. , 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[72]  A. Scott Use of an erbium laser in lieu of retraction cord: a modern technique. , 2005, General dentistry.

[73]  D L Dixon,et al.  Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[74]  C. Ercoli,et al.  The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.