A Special Section entitled “Challenges to and opportunities for biodiversity science-policy interfaces”

[1]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[2]  R. Watson,et al.  Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Juliette Young,et al.  Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European Network of Knowledge , 2015 .

[4]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering , 2013 .

[5]  C. Görg,et al.  A New Link Between Biodiversity Science and Policy , 2010 .

[6]  Marnie L Campbell,et al.  ‘Double trouble’: the expansion of the Suez Canal and marine bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea , 2015, Biological Invasions.

[7]  Bernd Siebenhüner,et al.  The role of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity as science–policy interface , 2008 .

[8]  Aram J. K. Calhoun,et al.  Rethinking the role of ecological research in the sustainable management of freshwater ecosystems , 2010 .

[9]  B. Head.  Wicked Problems in Public Policy , 2008 .

[10]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  David C Rose,et al.  The case for policy-relevant conservation science , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  S. Reinecke.  Knowledge brokerage designs and practices in four european climate services: A role model for biodiversity policies? , 2015 .

[13]  Diane Stone,et al.  Using Knowledge: The dilemmas of 'Bridging Research and Policy' , 2002 .

[14]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  B. Bartkowski,et al.  Informing biodiversity policy: The role of economic valuation, deliberative institutions and deliberative monetary valuation , 2015 .

[16]  M. Spierenburg.  Getting the message across biodiversity science and policy interfaces: A review , 2012 .

[17]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis : An Introduction , 2001 .

[18]  Simo Sarkki,et al.  Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces , 2015 .

[19]  P. Weingart.  Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics , 1999 .

[20]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between Mother Earth and ecosystem services , 2015 .

[21]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  A Rationale for Science-Policy Interfaces , 2007 .

[22]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  Marnie L Campbell,et al.  The Enlargement of the Suez Canal and Introduction of Non‐Indigenous Species to the Mediterranean Sea , 2015 .