Negation and the left periphery in Finnish

This paper investigates the effects of negation and contrast on Finnish word order. It is well known that prosodically focused, contrastive constituents only occur in certain syntactic positions in Finnish. However, many of these patterns are reversed in negative sentences when negation is preposed from its canonical post-subject position to a sentence-initial location. Corpus examples show that preposed negation is used to negate propositions which are old/known information to the discourse participants. I present a detailed analysis of the structure of the Finnish left periphery which makes use of this information-structural property in order to account for the seemingly surprising changes concerning the positions where contrastive constituents can occur.

[1]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Reference in single sentences and in texts , 1990, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[2]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[3]  Robert Rodman.  On left dislocation 1 , 1974 .

[4]  M. Chodorow,et al.  Pronoun resolution in two-clause sentences: Effects of ambiguity, antecedent location, and depth of embedding ☆ , 1988 .

[5]  M. Walker,et al.  Centering Theory in Discourse , 1998 .

[6]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Elements of Grammar: Handbook In Generative Syntax , 1998 .

[7]  U. Nikanne,et al.  Expletives, Subjects, and Topics in Finnish , 2002 .

[8]  I. Laka.  Negation in syntax--on the nature of functional categories and projections , 1990 .

[9]  Anders Holmberg,et al.  Deriving OV Order in Finnish , 2000 .

[10]  Maribel Romero,et al.  On Negative Yes/No Questions , 2004 .

[11]  Susi Wurmbrand.  Agree: The other VP-internal subject hypothesis , 2003 .

[12]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[13]  H. V. Riemsdijk,et al.  Materials on Left Dislocation , 1997 .

[14]  Carl Pollard,et al.  A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.

[15]  Anne Marjatta Vainikka,et al.  Deriving syntactic representations in Finnish , 1989 .

[16]  Tilman N. Höhle.  Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen , 1992 .

[17]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  The quest for a referent: A crosslinguistic look at reference resolution , 2003 .

[18]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP , 2002 .

[19]  Louise McNally,et al.  The Limits of Syntax , 1998 .

[20]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  The discourse functions and syntax of OSV word order in Finnish , 2000 .

[21]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[23]  R. Zanuttini.  Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages , 1997 .

[24]  G. Ward,et al.  On the topicalization of indefinite NPs , 1991 .

[25]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  Constituent order in the languages of Europe , 1998 .

[26]  Fred Karlsson.  Finnish: An Essential Grammar , 1999 .

[27]  Riitta Välimaa-Blum.  Compte-rendu de lecture de : « Maria Vilkuna : Free Word Order in Finnish: Its Syntax and Discourse Functions. Helsinki : Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura, 1989. » , 1991 .

[28]  Satu Manninen,et al.  Generative Approaches to Finnic and Saami Linguistics , 2003 .

[29]  Lauri Carlson.  Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis , 1982 .

[30]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[31]  Hideki Maki,et al.  Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese , 1999 .

[32]  Trond Trosterud,et al.  The Structure of INFL and the Finite Clause in Finnish , 1993 .

[33]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Informational redundancy and resource bounds in dialogue , 1993 .

[34]  Maria Vilkuna,et al.  Free word order in Finnish : its syntax and discourse functions , 1991 .

[35]  Carl Bache,et al.  Tense, aspect and action : empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology , 1994 .

[36]  Anders Holmberg,et al.  The syntax of yes and no in Finnish , 2001 .

[37]  Maria Vilkuna,et al.  On Rheme and Kontrast , 1998 .

[38]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[39]  Erika Mitchell,et al.  Evidence from Finnish for Pollock's theory of IP , 1991 .

[40]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions , 1996 .

[41]  Asya Pereltsvaig,et al.  Topic and focus as linear notions: evidence from Italian and Russian , 2004 .

[42]  Riitta Välimaa‐Blum,et al.  Finnish existential clauses – their syntax, pragmatics and intonation , 1988 .

[43]  A. Schwegler.  Predicate Negotiation in Contemporary Brazilian Portuguese , 1991 .

[44]  Maria Nella Carminati,et al.  The processing of Italian subject pronouns , 2002 .

[45]  E. Prince.  The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[46]  P. Kiparsky.  Partitive Case and Aspect , 2004 .

[47]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Functional Centering - Grounding Referential Coherence in Information Structure , 1999, Comput. Linguistics.

[48]  Peter Svenonius.  The derivation of VO and OV , 2000 .

[49]  Anders Holmberg.  Word order variation in some European SVO languages: a parametric approach , 1998 .

[50]  Urpo Nikanne,et al.  Case and other functional categories in Finnish syntax , 1993 .