Impaired Judgment: The Effects of Asset Impairment Reversibility and Cognitive Dissonance on Future Investment

This paper examines how the reversibility of the accounting effect of asset impairments affects managers’ investment decisions. We conduct two experiments in which participants act as CEO of a multi-division electronics company that suffers a large asset impairment at one of the divisions. Drawing on prior psychology research involving cognitive dissonance and decision reversibility, we predict and find that managers who are responsible for the decision to record the asset impairment invest more in the impaired division when the accounting effect of the impairment is reversible than when it is irreversible. This is consistent with the idea that reversible accounting effects encourage behavioral attempts to alter the cash flow outcome, while irreversible accounting effects encourage belief revision to rationalize the cash flow outcome. Also in line with cognitive dissonance theory, we show that managers who are not responsible for the decision to impair the asset, or managers who are given the opportunity to deny responsibility for the asset impairment, do not differ in their investment in the impaired division, regardless of impairment reversibility.

[1]  B. Collins,et al.  Personal responsibility-for-consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature , 1972 .

[2]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Re‐evaluation of decision alternatives dependent upon the reversibility of a decision and the passage of time , 1984 .

[3]  Sarah L. C. Zechman,et al.  Executive Overconfidence and the Slippery Slope to Financial Misreporting , 2011 .

[4]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[5]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Experimental Research in Financial Accounting , 2001 .

[6]  Jeffrey Hales.  Directional Preferences, Information Processing, and Investors' Forecasts of Earnings , 2007 .

[7]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change. , 1967 .

[8]  W. K. Campbell,et al.  Self-Threat Magnifies the Self-Serving Bias: A Meta-Analytic Integration , 1999 .

[9]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Financial Reporting Transparency and Earnings Management , 2006 .

[10]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel Read,et al.  DRIFT: an analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions , 2001 .

[13]  Dominique Oberlé,et al.  Denial of responsibility: a new mode of dissonance reduction. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S. Gangestad,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. Aharony,et al.  The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Equity Valuation of Accounting Numbers for Security Investors in the EU , 2010 .

[16]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Shimin Chen,et al.  Regulatory Incentives for Earnings Management through Asset Impairment Reversals in China , 2009 .

[18]  P. C. O'brien,et al.  Inco Ltd.: Market Value, Fair Value, and Management Discretion* , 2009 .

[19]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[20]  Jane M. Thayer.  Determinants of Investors’ Information Acquisition: Credibility and Confirmation , 2011 .

[21]  James A. Scepansky,et al.  Spontaneous Skepticism: The Interplay of Motivation and Expectation in Responses to Favorable and Unfavorable Medical Diagnoses , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Nicholas Seybert,et al.  Contagion of Wishful Thinking in Markets , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[24]  James A. Scepansky,et al.  Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. , 1998 .

[25]  Robert Libby,et al.  Retraction: Capital Market Pressure, Disclosure Frequency-Induced Earnings/Cash Flow Conflict, and Managerial Myopia , 2005 .

[26]  Scott B. Jackson.  The Effect of Firms' Depreciation Method Choice on Managers' Capital Investment Decisions , 2008 .

[27]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the was on Selection Task , 2002 .

[28]  James J Gross,et al.  Same situation--different emotions: how appraisals shape our emotions. , 2007, Emotion.

[29]  Tim Brown.  Advantageous Comparison and Rationalization of Earnings Management , 2014 .

[30]  L. Abramson,et al.  Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Survey research. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Scott B. Jackson,et al.  The effect of depreciation method choice on asset selling prices , 2010 .

[33]  Jeffrey Hales,et al.  Who Believes the Hype? An Experimental Examination of how Language Affects Investor Judgments , 2010 .

[34]  Kim Trottier.  The Effect of Reversibility on a Manager's Decision to Record Asset Impairments , 2011 .

[35]  Investors’ Reactions to Management Earnings Guidance: The Joint Effect of Investment Position, News Valence, and Guidance Form , 2009 .

[36]  J. Brehm,et al.  Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance , 1962 .

[37]  R. Libby,et al.  Self-Serving Attribution Bias, Overconfidence and the Issuance of Management Forecasts , 2010 .

[38]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions , 1992 .

[39]  Dustin J. Sleesman,et al.  CLEANING UP THE BIG MUDDY: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF THE DETERMINANTS OF ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT , 2012 .

[40]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  O. Tykocinski,et al.  Coping with disappointing outcomes: Retroactive pessimism and motivated inhibition of counterfactuals , 2005 .

[42]  Kathryn Kadous,et al.  The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations , 2003 .

[43]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK 1 We appreciate helpf , 1999 .

[44]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.