Gd-DTPA-enhanced 3D MR imaging of cervical degenerative disk disease: initial experience.

PURPOSE To assess whether a single enhanced T1-weighted gradient echo volume sequence, with the appropriate reformatted images, could be equivalent to a more conventional 2D set of MR sequences for the evaluation of cervical extradural degenerative disk disease (bony canal and foraminal stenosis; disk herniation). MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-one patients evaluated for extradural degenerative disease by MR were imaged with a "standard" MR examination (Sagittal T1-weighted spin echo, axial low flip angle gradient echo), were then given 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA intravenously, and reimaged with either a 3D FLASH (fast low angle shot), TR 40/TE 7/1 excitation), 40 degree flip angle, acquired as 64, 2-mm sagittal partitions, or a 3D turbo FLASH (MP RAGE-magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo) (10/4/1), 10 degree flip angle acquired as 128, 2-mm coronal partitions. The volume sequences were reconstructed in the axial plane, and right and left 45 degree oblique coronal planes. The two sets of examinations (standard vs volume) were prospectively interpreted by two neuroradiologists for quality of examination, and location, type, and severity of extradural degenerative disease in a random, blinded, independent fashion. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the standard examination and the 3D MP RAGE for central extradural disease. The 3D FLASH examination was significantly worse than the standard examination in identification of central extradural disease, with an average of 21 herniations not identified, or underestimated in size. Neither the 3D FLASH, nor the 3D MP RAGE examinations showed any significant improvement compared to the routine 2D examination for the location and severity of foraminal disease. CONCLUSION If extradural degenerative disk disease is being evaluated, then a single enhanced 3D T1-weighted imaging sequence taking 6 minutes can be equivalent to a routine set of mixed 2D spin echo and low flip angle gradient echo sequences.

[1]  M. Modic,et al.  Gradient-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  E. Russell.  Cervical disk disease. , 1990, Radiology.

[3]  V M Haughton,et al.  Characteristic features of MR truncation artifacts. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  E. Russell,et al.  Cervical disk herniation: CT demonstration after contrast enhancement. , 1984, Radiology.

[5]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy by surface-coil MR imaging. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  T. H. Newton,et al.  Three-dimensional gradient-recalled MR imaging as a screening tool for the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. , 1989, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  D M Kramer,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio and section thickness in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[8]  V M Haughton,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  D. Feinberg,et al.  Contiguous thin multisection MR imaging by two-dimensional Fourier transform techniques. , 1986, Radiology.

[10]  B. Drayer,et al.  Gradient echo (GRASS) MR imaging in cervical radiculopathy. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R. Marcus,et al.  Assessment of extradural degenerative disease with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  M. Modic,et al.  Cervical radiculopathy: value of oblique MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[13]  D. Enzmann,et al.  Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part II. Spinal cord disease. , 1988, Radiology.

[14]  D Matthaei,et al.  Rapid three-dimensional MR imaging using the FLASH technique. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  G M Bydder,et al.  The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  T J Masaryk,et al.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[17]  E M Haacke,et al.  Fast MR imaging: techniques and clinical applications. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. Modic,et al.  Cervical radiculopathy: prospective evaluation with surface coil MR imaging, CT with metrizamide, and metrizamide myelography. , 1986, Radiology.