The Composite Channel Method: Efficient Experimental Evaluation of a Realistic MIMO Terminal in the Presence of a Human Body

The immediate environment of the transmit (TX) and receive (RX) antennas, including the antenna casings and the users holding the antennas, has a strong impact on the propagation channel and thus on wireless systems. In this paper we experimentally evaluate a method that synthetically combines double-directional measurements of the propagation channel (without the user influence) with measured antenna patterns of antennas-plus-users, by comparing obtained sample results with direct measurements in the same environment. The measurements are done for a static microcell 8times4 MIMO scenario at 2.6 GHz. A realistic user phantom was used together with a test terminal prototype with four antenna elements, and a number of different configurations and orientations of the phantom were tested. In average over all test cases, the mean signal power deviation between composite channel method and measurements was well within 1 dB. The composite method shows 6% higher terminal antenna correlation but similar statistical distributions as the measured. The differences between the model and measurements for the strongest eigenvalue (relevant for MRC combining) was found to be within 1 dB above 10% outage level. Relative deviations in the ergodic MIMO capacity were smaller than 10%.

[1]  Ernst Bonek,et al.  Diversity arrangements for internal handset antennas , 1997, Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - PIMRC '97.

[2]  Kim Olesen,et al.  Comparison of Phantoms in a Browsing Position by a NLOS Outdoor MIMO Propagation Test , 2007 .

[3]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Modelling realistic electromagnetic effects on MIMO system capacity , 2002 .

[4]  Gert Frølund Pedersen,et al.  Influence of human hand on mobile phone radiation , 2007 .

[5]  H. Asplund,et al.  MIMO channel characteristics in a small macrocell measured at 5.25 GHz and 200 MHz bandwidth , 2005, VTC-2005-Fall. 2005 IEEE 62nd Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005..

[6]  M. J. Gans,et al.  On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas , 1998, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[7]  Pertti Vainikainen,et al.  Evaluation of the Performance of Multiantenna Terminals Using a New Approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Andreas F. Molisch,et al.  The double-directional radio channel , 2001 .

[9]  C. Icheln,et al.  Evaluation of performance of multi-antenna terminals using two approaches , 2004, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510).

[10]  P. Vainikainen,et al.  Empirical comparison of MIMO antenna configurations , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[11]  Reiner S. Thomä,et al.  Capacity of MIMO systems based on measured wireless channels , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..