Integration of active and passive compliance control for safe human-robot coexistence

In this paper we discuss the integration of active and passive approaches to robotic safety in an overall scheme for real-time manipulator control. The active control approach is based on the use of a supervisory visual system, which detects the presence and position of humans in the vicinity of the robot arm, and generates motion references. The passive control approach uses variable joint impedance which combines with velocity control to guarantee safety in worst-case conditions, i.e. unforeseen impacts. The implementation of these techniques in a 3-dof, variable impedance arm is described, and the effectiveness of their functional integration is demonstrated through experiments.

[1]  Ioannis Iossifidis,et al.  Dynamical Systems Approach for the Autonomous Avoidance of Obstacles and Joint-limits for an Redundant Robot Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[3]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  John T. Feddema,et al.  A capacitance-based proximity sensor for whole arm obstacle avoidance , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  O. Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Dominik Henrich,et al.  Velocity control for safe robot guidance based on fused vision and force/torque data , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems.

[7]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Whole-body motion planning for pivoting based manipulation by humanoids , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  Using Backprojections for Fine Motion Planning with Uncertainty , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  H. Opower.  Multiple view geometry in computer vision , 2002 .

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Masatoshi Ishikawa,et al.  Safe human-robot-coexistence: emergency-stop using a high-speed vision-chip , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  John T. Feddema,et al.  Whole arm obstacle avoidance for teleoperated robots , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Pre-collision safety strategies for human-robot interaction , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[15]  Dominik Henrich,et al.  Human-robot cooperation: safe pick-and-place operations , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[16]  Gary M. Bone,et al.  Real-time 3D Collision Avoidance Method for Safe Human and Robot Coexistence , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.