Evaluation of the radiopacity of calcium hydroxide- and glass-ionomer-based root canal sealers.

AIM To evaluate the radiopacity of calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers (Acroseal, Sealapex and Sealer 26), a glass-ionomer-based sealer (Activ GP Sealer) and a zinc oxide and eugenol-based sealer (Intrafill). METHODOLOGY Five disc-shaped specimens (10 x 1 mm) were fabricated from each material, according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 6876/2001 standard. After setting of the materials, radiographs were taken using occlusal films and a graduated aluminum step-wedge varying from 2 to 16 mm in thickness. The dental X-ray unit (GE1000) was set at 50 Kvp, 10 mA, 18 pulses s(-1) and distance of 33.5 cm. The radiographs were digitized and the radiopacity compared with that of the aluminum step-wedge, using WIXWIN-2000 software (Gendex). Data (mm Al) were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test. RESULTS Intrafill was the most radiopaque material (7.67 mm Al) followed by Sealer 26 (6.33 mm Al), Sealapex (6.05 mm Al) and Acroseal (4.03 mm Al). Activ GP was the least radiopaque material (1.95 mm Al, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The sealers evaluated in this study had different radiopacities. However, except for the glass-ionomer-based sealer, all materials had radiopacity values above the minimum recommended by the ISO standard.

[1]  M. Tanomaru-Filho,et al.  Radiopacity evaluation of new root canal filling materials by digitalization of images. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  S. Belli,et al.  The quantitative evaluation of apical sealing of four endodontic sealers. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  M. Gonçalves,et al.  Evaluation of the radiopacity of root canal sealers by digitization of radiographic images. , 2004, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[4]  M. Tagger,et al.  A standard for radiopacity of root-end (retrograde) filling materials is urgently needed. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[5]  M. Tagger,et al.  Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  M. Turgut,et al.  Radiopacity of direct esthetic restorative materials. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[7]  G. Nocca,et al.  Cytotoxicity of a new endodontic filling material. , 2003, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[8]  T. Komabayashi,et al.  Properties of a new injectable type of root canal filling resin with adhesiveness to dentin. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  M. Serra,et al.  Radiopacity of glass-ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials. , 1998, Brazilian dental journal.

[10]  C. Cutler,et al.  Comparative radiopacity of tetracalcium phosphate and other root-end filling materials. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[11]  P. Gürdal,et al.  Comparison of two methods for radiometric evaluation of resin-based restorative materials. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[12]  L. A. Silva,et al.  Effect of different root canal sealers on periapical repair of teeth with chronic periradicular periodontitis. , 1998, International endodontic journal.

[13]  L. A. Silva,et al.  Calcium hydroxide root canal sealers--histopathologic evaluation of apical and periapical repair after endodontic treatment. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  A. Farman,et al.  The radiographic density of composite restorative resins. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[15]  M. Tagger,et al.  Densitometric measurement of radiopacity of Gutta-percha cones and root dentin. , 1990, Journal of Endodontics.

[16]  R. Holland,et al.  Ability of a new calcium hydroxide root canal filling material to induce hard tissue formation. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  D. Orstavik,et al.  Radiopacity of root canal sealers. , 1981, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[18]  S. Elíasson,et al.  Radiopacity of impression materials. , 1979, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[19]  D. McComb,et al.  Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate-based and conventional root canal sealers. , 1976, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  T. Higginbotham A comparative study of the physical properties of five commonly used root canal sealers , 1967 .