US climate policy needs behavioural science

State implementation of new Environmental Protection Agency climate regulation may shift behavioural strategies from sidelines to forefront of US climate policy.

[1]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework , 2014 .

[2]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  E. Aronson,et al.  The Effectiveness of Incentives for Residential Energy Conservation , 1986 .

[4]  Yozo Okamoto.  On the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings , 2005 .

[5]  Michael Greenstone,et al.  An economic perspective on the EPA's Clean Power Plan , 2014, Science.

[6]  Acknowledgements , 1992, Experimental Gerontology.

[7]  J. Trainham,et al.  Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change , 2010 .

[8]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Diversity: Energy studies need social science , 2014, Nature.

[9]  K. Frank,et al.  What Would It Take to Change an Inference? Using Rubin’s Causal Model to Interpret the Robustness of Causal Inferences , 2013 .

[10]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Larsen,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2002 .

[12]  Jan E. Leighley.  Politics , 2013 .

[13]  S. Ansolabehere,et al.  Social Sciences & the Alternative Energy Future , 2013, Daedalus.

[14]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .