Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Independence

This paper provides empirical evidence that audit committee independence is associated with economic factors. I find that audit committee independence increases with board size and board independence and decreases with the firm's growth opportunities and for firms that report consecutive losses. In contrast, no relation is found between audit committee independence and creditors' demand for accounting information. Although the analyses are based on data from 1991 to 1993, these results have implications for NYSE and NASDAQ listing requirements for audit committees adopted in December 1999. Specifically, the new requirements give firms the option of including non‐outside directors on their audit committees if it is in the best interests of the firm to do so.

[1]  Carla K. Hayn The information content of losses , 1995 .

[2]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance , 1997 .

[3]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  The Determinants of Board Composition , 1988 .

[4]  Robert H. Montgomery,et al.  Montgomery's Auditing , 1975 .

[5]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[6]  Kenneth A. Froot Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Cross-Sectional Dependence and Heteroskedasticity in Financial Data , 1989, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[7]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health , 1998 .

[8]  D. Yermack Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors , 1996 .

[9]  E. Fama Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  David G. Mathiasen Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[11]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals , 1994 .

[12]  Paul Zarowin,et al.  The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them , 1999 .

[13]  R. Lipe,et al.  Do nonlinearity, firm-specific coefficients, and losses represent distinct factors in the relation between stock returns and accounting earnings? , 1998 .

[14]  Daniel W. Collins,et al.  Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings: The Role of Book Value of Equity , 1999 .

[15]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting , 2000 .

[16]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[17]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants , 1979 .

[18]  Jay W. Lorsch,et al.  A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance , 1992 .

[19]  O. Williamson Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization , 1975 .

[20]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies , 1992 .

[21]  April Klein,et al.  Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure1 , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  C. C. Verschoor Benchmarking the Audit Committee , 1993 .

[23]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[24]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[25]  Laura Casares Field,et al.  The Expiration of IPO Share Lockups , 2000 .