Quantitative analysis of lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities at 3.0 Tesla: value of T2 texture features and geometric parameters

T2 relaxation time mapping provides information about the biochemical status of intervertebral discs. The present study aimed to determine whether texture features extracted from T2 maps or geometric parameters are sensitive to the presence of abnormalities at the posterior aspect of lumbar intervertebral discs, i.e. bulging and herniation. Thirty‐one patients (21 women and 10 men; age range 18–51 years) with low back pain were enrolled. MRI of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla included morphological T1‐ and T2‐weighted fast spin‐echo sequences, and multi‐echo spin‐echo sequences that were used to construct T2 maps. On morphological MRI, discs were visually graded into ‘normal’, ‘bulging’ or ‘herniation’. On T2 maps, texture analysis (based on the co‐occurrence matrix and wavelet transform) and geometry analysis of the discs were performed. The three T2 texture features and geometric parameters best‐suited for distinguishing between normal discs and discs with bulging or herniation were determined using Fisher coefficients. Statistical analysis comprised ANCOVA and post hoc t‐tests. Eighty‐two discs were classified as ‘normal’, 49 as ‘bulging’ and 20 showed ‘herniation.’ The T2 texture features Entropy and Difference Variance, and all three pre‐selected geometric parameters differed significantly between normal and bulging, normal and herniated, and bulging and herniated discs (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that T2 texture features and geometric parameters are sensitive to the presence of abnormalities at the posterior aspect of lumbar intervertebral discs, and may thus be useful as quantitative biomarkers that predict disease. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jensen Mc,et al.  MRI of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. , 1994 .

[2]  H S Amonoo-Kuofi,et al.  Morphometric changes in the heights and anteroposterior diameters of the lumbar intervertebral discs with age. , 1991, Journal of anatomy.

[3]  Jian Fan,et al.  Texture Classification by Wavelet Packet Signatures , 1993, MVA.

[4]  V. Haughton,et al.  T2 Relaxation Times of Intervertebral Disc Tissue Correlated With Water Content and Proteoglycan Content , 2009, Spine.

[5]  K. Kim,et al.  Disc Height and Segmental Motion as Risk Factors for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation , 2009, Spine.

[6]  M Kormano,et al.  Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. , 1991, Spine.

[7]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  D. Eyre,et al.  Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. , 1979, International review of connective tissue research.

[10]  A. Borthakur,et al.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the assessment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. , 2007, Seminars in spine surgery.

[11]  V. Haughton,et al.  T2 Relaxation Times Correlated with Stage of Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Patient Age , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  S. Trattnig,et al.  Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[13]  A. Todd-Pokropek,et al.  Texture-based quantification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration from conventional T2-weighted MRI , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[14]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Spatial distribution and relationship of T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in knee cartilage with osteoarthritis , 2009, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[15]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T , 2010, European Radiology.

[16]  John Kornak,et al.  In vivo 3.0‐tesla magnetic resonance T1ρ and T2 relaxation mapping in subjects with intervertebral disc degeneration and clinical symptoms , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  G. Navon,et al.  Monitoring of the effect of intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus ablation by MRI , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[18]  A. Borthakur,et al.  In vivo quantification of human lumbar disc degeneration using T1ρ-weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[19]  A. Borthakur,et al.  Assessment of Human Disc Degeneration and Proteoglycan Content Using T1&rgr;-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Spine.

[20]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Spatial analysis of magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation times improves classification between subjects with and without osteoarthritis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[21]  C. Mistretta,et al.  The value of T2 relaxation times to characterize lumbar intervertebral disks: preliminary results. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  Michal Strzelecki,et al.  FEATURE EVALUATION OF TEXTURE TEST OBJECTS FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING , 2001 .

[23]  David M Doman,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spine Disc Herniations: Comparison of Clinician and Radiologist Readings , 2009, Spine.

[24]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Feasibility of Texture Analysis for the Assessment of Biochemical Changes in Meniscal Tissue on T1 Maps Calculated From Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage Data: Comparison With Conventional Relaxation Time Measurements , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[25]  G. Gurtner,et al.  Statistics in medicine. , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  Amonoo-Kuofi Hs,et al.  Morphometric changes in the heights and anteroposterior diameters of the lumbar intervertebral discs with age. , 1991 .

[27]  Andrzej Materka,et al.  Texture analysis for magnetic resonance imaging , 2006 .

[28]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[29]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[30]  Q. Chan,et al.  Assessment of glycosaminoglycan distribution in human lumbar intervertebral discs using chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3 T: feasibility and initial experience , 2011, NMR in biomedicine.

[31]  Patrick C. Chen,et al.  Segmentation by texture using a co-occurrence matrix and a split-and-merge algorithm☆ , 1979 .

[32]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  Classification of intervertebral disk degeneration with axial T2 mapping. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  G B Andersson,et al.  The influence of lumbar disc height and cross-sectional area on the mechanical response of the disc to physiologic loading. , 1999, Spine.

[34]  V. Haughton Imaging intervertebral disc degeneration. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  J. Ross,et al.  Lumbar degenerative disk disease. , 2007, Radiology.

[36]  G. Pike,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of degenerative disc disease , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Achim Elfering,et al.  Effect of aging and degeneration on disc volume and shape: A quantitative study in asymptomatic volunteers , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.