Toward an integrated theory of the firm: The interplay between internal organization and vertical integration

Research summary: Two central issues in strategic management are the determination of a firm's internal delegation and its vertical boundaries. Despite the importance of these issues, there is scant analysis concerning their interaction. Using a comprehensive database of the construction industry, we show that vertical integration positively influences the centralization decision and that the main mechanism driving this relationship is an improvement in the hierarchically coordinated adaptation of firm activities when complexity and uncertainty are high. We also observe that centralization is negatively related to the extent of relational contracts between principals and agents, and positively related to an exogenous increase in the cost of employee layoffs. Our results suggest that managers cannot consider firm boundaries and internal organization to be independent decisions. Managerial summary: We ask whether a firm's decision about vertically integrating or outsourcing its activities affects the choice of centralizing or delegating its internal decision-making process. Our statistical analysis shows that firms with more vertical integration tend to centralize the decision-making process and that firms that outsource more tend to decentralize more. Why? Vertical integration enables the use of centralized authority to coordinate activities that interact intensively. Accordingly, we found that the positive influence of vertical integration on centralization is especially significant in more complex and uncertain environments, when the need for coordination is higher. Thus, our results suggest that managers should choose vertical integration considering its effect on internal decision-making processes, particularly when coordination is important. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations , 1973 .

[2]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[3]  R. Eccles The quasifirm in the construction industry , 1981 .

[4]  Ibbs C. William “Brand Name or Equal” Product Specifications , 1986 .

[5]  Paolo Leon The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1986, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[6]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Diseconomies of Scale in Employment Contracts , 1990 .

[7]  O. Hart,et al.  Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[9]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[10]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  The Firm as an Incentive System , 1994 .

[11]  O. Williamson,et al.  Transaction Cost Economics , 1995 .

[12]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination , 1995 .

[13]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  Organizational Diseconomies of Scale , 1995 .

[14]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[15]  Luigi Zingales,et al.  Power in a Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[16]  J. Tirole,et al.  Formal and Real Authority in Organizations , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Alberto Fernández,et al.  Regulation as a cause of firm fragmentation:the case of the Spanish construction industry , 1998 .

[18]  Frobisher Crescent Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992-1996 , 1999 .

[19]  C. Somerville The Industrial Organization of Housing Supply: Market Activity, Land Supply and the Size of Homebuilder Firms , 1999 .

[20]  Bengt Holmstrom The Firm as a Subeconomy , 1999 .

[21]  O. Williamson The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[22]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  Role of the Fabricator in Labor Productivity , 2000 .

[23]  A. Davies,et al.  Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions , 2000 .

[24]  Graham Winch,et al.  Governing the project process: a conceptual framework , 2001 .

[25]  A. Ichino,et al.  The Effect of Employment Protection on Worker Effort: A Comparison of Absenteeism During and after Probation , 2001 .

[26]  George P. Baker,et al.  BRINGING THE MARKET INSIDE THE FIRM , 2001 .

[27]  Naief Turki Ibn-Homaid,et al.  A comparative evaluation of construction and manufacturing materials management , 2002 .

[28]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[29]  I. Png,et al.  Monitoring Costs and the Mode of International Investment , 2002 .

[30]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[31]  Oliver Hart,et al.  A Theory of Firm Scope , 2002 .

[32]  Steven Tadelis,et al.  Complexity, Flexibility, and the Make-or-Buy Decision , 2002 .

[33]  Laura Poppo,et al.  The Visible Hands of Hierarchy within the M‐Form: An Empirical Test of Corporate Parenting of Internal Product Exchanges* , 2003 .

[34]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[35]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Implications of Even Flow Production Methodology for U.S. Housing Industry , 2003 .

[36]  Howard A. Shelanski Transaction-level determinants of transfer-pricing policy: evidence from the high-technology sector , 2004 .

[37]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[39]  Johnathan Roberts,et al.  The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .

[40]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[41]  David R. Riley,et al.  Benefit-Cost Metrics for Design Coordination of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Systems in Multistory Buildings , 2005 .

[42]  P. Garrouste,et al.  Looking for a Theory of the Firm: Future Challenges , 2005 .

[43]  Regina T. Riphahn,et al.  The Effect of Employment Protection on Worker Effort: Absenteeism During and After Probation , 2005 .

[44]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Performance Pay, Delegation and Multitasking under Uncertainty and Innovativeness: An Empirical Investigation , 2005 .

[45]  M. Jacobides,et al.  The Dynamic Limits of Specialization: Vertical Integration Reconsidered , 2005 .

[46]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Technology, Information and the Decentralization of the Firm , 2006 .

[47]  H. P. Bowen,et al.  The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: assessment and critique , 2006 .

[48]  Timo Ala-Risku,et al.  Material delivery problems in construction projects: A possible solution , 2006 .

[49]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Capabilities, Contractual Hazards, and Governance: Integrating Resource-Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives , 2006 .

[50]  Lars Stehn,et al.  Applicability of lean principles and practices in industrialized housing production , 2008 .

[51]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[52]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[53]  Mara Lederman,et al.  Adaptation and Vertical Integration in the Airline Industry , 2009 .

[54]  Andrew S. Chang,et al.  Coordination Needs and Supply of Construction Projects , 2009 .

[55]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  Taxonomy for change causes and effects in construction projects , 2009 .

[56]  Scott Stern,et al.  Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[57]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  The Organization of Firms Across Countries , 2009 .

[58]  R. Coff,et al.  Both Market and Hierarchy: An Incentive-System Theory of Hybrid Governance Forms , 2009 .

[59]  Margarethe F. Wiersema,et al.  The Use of Limited Dependent Variable Techniques in Strategy Research: Issues and Methods , 2009 .

[60]  Pedro S. Martins Dismissals for Cause: The Difference That Just Eight Paragraphs Can Make , 2007, Journal of Labor Economics.

[61]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Judith Clifton,et al.  Did New Public Management Matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size , 2015 .

[63]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[64]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  Testing management theories: critical realist philosophy and research methods , 2011 .

[65]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Relational Contracts and Organizational Capabilities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[66]  Matthew Bidwell,et al.  Politics and Firm Boundaries: How Organizational Structure, Group Interests, and Resources Affect Outsourcing , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[67]  James G. Combs,et al.  Who should own it? An agency‐based explanation for multi‐outlet ownership and co‐location in plural form franchising , 2012 .

[68]  P. Aghion,et al.  Incomplete Contracts and the Internal Organization of Firms , 2013 .

[69]  S. Zahra,et al.  The Role of External Knowledge Sources and Organizational Design in the Process of Opportunity Exploitation , 2013 .

[70]  B. Quélin,et al.  Decentralization and Contracting Out: A New Pattern for Internal and External Boundaries of the Firm , 2013 .

[71]  B. Jacob The Effect of Employment Protection on Teacher Effort , 2013, Journal of Labor Economics.

[72]  Yue Maggie Zhou,et al.  Designing for Complexity: Using Divisions and Hierarchy to Manage Complex Tasks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[73]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  Implications of internal organization structure for firm boundaries , 2013 .

[74]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Market frictions as building blocks of an organizational economics approach to strategic management , 2013 .

[75]  Ricard Gil,et al.  Self-Enforcing Agreements and Relational Contracting: Evidence from California Highway Procurement , 2013 .

[76]  Incomplete Contracts and the Internal Organization of Firms , 2014 .

[77]  Christian Koch,et al.  A model of functional integration and conflict: The case of purchasing-production in a construction company , 2014 .

[78]  Kristina McElheran Delegation in Multi‐Establishment Firms: Evidence from I.T. Purchasing , 2014 .

[79]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure† , 2014 .

[80]  Kieron J. Meagher,et al.  Delegation of Decisions About Change in Organizations: The Roles of Competition, Trade, Uncertainty, and Scale , 2014 .

[81]  Peter G. Klein,et al.  Why managers still matter , 2014 .

[82]  Mu-Jeung Yang,et al.  Estimating Management Practice Complementarity between Decentralization and Performance Pay , 2015 .

[83]  M. Powell An Influence-Cost Model of Organizational Practices and Firm Boundaries , 2015 .

[84]  Niko Matouschek,et al.  Organizing to adapt and compete , 2015 .

[85]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Strategic incentives to human capital , 2015 .